>>2958750>when the technology is the it does, Speak English.
>and FF to aps-c it's actually 1.2 ev, so it will be nearly 1.7 ev between nikon and canon. topkek>implying the dxo screen graph wouldn't show exactly that if trueDR is primarily a pixel level property driven by the chip design. Most importantly: are the ADCs on the chip or off the chip?
Canon finally moved to on chip ADCs. Their newest sensors are in the 13ev range like almost everyone else. (Nikon is using Sony Exmor but they are squeezing a bit more out of it than Sony themselves. Not sure how/why.)
You can randomly pick two Sony's or a Sony and a Nikon and get differences of 0.5ev. That's nothing in the real world.
tl;dr - you're being a measurebating faggot.
