>>2962778>Should I consider getting into film instead?If your try on dedicated b&w is not just an exploration, I bet film is equal or more expensive with buying a cheap digital camera and convert the photos to b&w. You could even shoot in b&w style preset to see b&w previews and even have a gray-scaled evf, the saved raw still contains all color information.
Exercise 1:
During his Venice trip of 10 days Mr. O'Sullivan shot about 72 exposures a day with its digital camera. What would it cost, if instead of his digital camera Mr. O'Sullivan took a film camera loaded with rather cheap black and white 35mm film that costs $4 and typically comes with 36 exposures each roll?
Exercise 2:
In each case, the photographs are neither edited nor printed. Try to set a task similar to exercise 1, considering further consequential cost.
For an advanced task: Film is not yet developed nor digitized .
