>>2964564Yeah, it's cheap, but what's the point of 4K if the lens is shit, the bitrate is shit, sound is double shit, there's no 24P, and if you're so poor then you probably can't afford a PC capable of rendering 4K anyway?
>>2964583>the 42mm has an 80mm portrait option as well as 90mm macroNo, it doesn't. It's a 85mm-equivalent lens with some close focus capability - 1:3 only counts as macro if you're desperate. Also, true macro would've been unusable anyway due to the lack of MF ring.
>>2964585I doubt you'd do interior pano shots with a 85mm lens though, which is what this Yi lens is equivalent to.
>>2964595>wider than 35 begins to give ugly distortions>MFT lenses don't see distortions heavily noticeable until below 1818mm on m43 = 36mm on film/FF, so you're both saying the exact same thing.
