>>2967804If what you say is true, I'm sorry if I have seemed un-appreciative of it. I hate to discourage actual critique. I do take on board whatever critique people offer as long as I can discern a thought behind it. I've changed my opinion on many of my photos that I used to be pleased with after friends have pointed out how it's shit in a way I can agree with.
If my presence annoys you that bad I suggest you filter me.
I receive feedback on photos from friends on the internet and from IRL discussions with art friends, but I don't have any sound bites to be copy pasted for you.
It's not by any means major critical breakdowns of individual pieces, mostly niggles about pictures or complete dismissals as shit photos. The difference being that when those come from people whom you trust the judgment of because you know their taste is aligned to yours, and they know what you are trying to do, it's easier to take it to heart.
Anonymous critique for me requires a lot more reasoning behind it to agree that it's worth taking notice of, since it can't rely on previous authority but has to claim it each time. And of course this is not something I expect people to have the patience to do for something which is so far from their personal taste, just something I appreciate when people do. Again I'm sorry if you feel your critique has not been appreciated, it's impossible for me to tell now if it was or not. Maybe adopt a name.
I don't claim to be good at critiquing either, or even trying to be.