>>2964290Supermoons happen all the time. Every year you hear about how this is the closest the moon will be for the next twenty years blah blah blah. The truth is, the moon looks barely bigger, you won't be able to see details that you couldn't just resolve with a better lens (and there will still be details beyond your ability to resolve, regardless of how close the moon is), and it's a full moon.
The full moon is lit by frontal light. It's flat, bland and featureless, and it makes even the best lens seem kind of meh. Best to shoot when it's near crescent phase, or even half full. You get the beauty of the light raking across the surface, which leads to more contrast and high frequency detail. You also get a better sense of the actual shape of the moon, which makes it seem more like a real actual physical object and not a 2D decal on the skybox.
