>>2979883>wanting me to read an article two times over, giving zero evidence, and only opinions.Not one mention of IQ, not a single mention of cranial volume, not a single mention of behavior (technically 3, because they only talk about the stance never talk about it), never talk about neanderthals. They only talk about surface details like skin color, and never actually show objective details and numbers.
Half the fucking article is about semantics "oh should this be considered race or should it be called ethnicity?"
Why not show fbi crime stats? Why not show what the africans are doing to eachother over there? Think it's a cultural thing? They just happen to have the same culture in detroit or chicago that they have in uganda just be chance??? Hell no, it's bred into them.
Let me ask you this. Do you agree that ethiopians are superior marathon runners compared to irish runners??
Please don't ban me, my pic related is photography
