>>2985306yes i think i will go to the city in the next weeks and see if i can test them out.
i tried astro in the past but wasnt very lucky. i only just got the 11-16 and used the sigma with a max aperture of 4 before.
i made 2-3 astro pics worth showing but most of the time it was just garbage.
i would however like to be able to do more in the future.
i compared the dxo mark scores (couldnt find a direct comparison between the two in low light.)
but those numbers really dont mean anything to me.
just how much worse is the a77m2 when handling high iso?
and on the other hand focus peaking has been very helpfull on the a58 for filming. autofocus doesnt really matter to me since sony doesnt let you choose the settings when using af, so i dont do that.
its a shame the d7200 cant do that .
also it seems that it wont do 60p video, while the sony does.
>>2985223i really dont like the canon dslr lineup desu.
i also looked into pentax, but they really dont have the lenses for me.
its either gonna be sony or nikon for me.
>>2985236i had my eyes on the a7ii but its just too expensive and i would have to buy some full frame lenses then also.
my friend has the a6300 and thought it felt really flimsy when using it. i would rather choose the a 6000 for me but i dont think i would have an advantage over the 77m2 when using it with a slt adapter.
also i would like a shoulder display on my next camera, just something i really miss on my current body.
thanks for the help so far guys. cant say you made the descission much easier for me yet, tho. but maybe thats just my spread use case.
