>>2983549This one, and the first photo are my favorite from last night.
>>2983551I did use the perspective correction tool, but I didn't like the results I got from it. Personal preference, even though I'm technically in the wrong.
>>2983562To get a correct exposure, and an almost dream like appearance? Long exposure doesn't always have to have motion anon.
>>2983568The Canon 50mm f/1.4 has 8 aperture blades, learn how to use Google. My Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 has 6 aperture blades. I shot at f/5.6 because it's typically a good sharpness for lenses by default, I don't know the optimal sharpness for each of my lenses. I didn't think about the starburst effect because I don't typically shoot at f/11 - f/16 all that often so that slipped my mind, that could've been beneficial to get that effect in this set of photos.
>>2983570Rules are meant to be broken, not all long exposures have to have motion in the frame. I like long exposures at night because it gives it a dream like appearance to the image. This thread is for all night time long exposures.
>>2983578This thread is for photos with long exposure times at night.
>>2983608There's a few things, but I don't know you're upset at me anon.
