>>2989998>In my defense,Spend less time defending yourself for being generic and falling into generic patterns and spend more time on developing your personal brand.
>when people see a picture of new york, they generally enjoy pictures of things they recognizeCongratulations, you've just defended the "art" of counterfeit Mona Lisas.
But are you actually taking photos for tourists? Or are you just using them as a wedge to distance yourself from a hard, insightful look into the quality of your work, self-described as;
"America's quickly emerging photographer, Kaz Canning, travels the U.S. bringing the most visually mastered images back from all corners of the country."
"At an early age, Kaz had always shown an interest and appreciation for art. His first interest was drawing, but when his grandfather gave him his first camera, Kaz's path was immediately changed. He spent the better part of a year learning the ins and outs of the camera. His early talents were recognized through his community, and he was offered a job as an assistant photographer at age 15. This opportunity allowed him to greatly hone in his skills at recognizing the intricacies of lighting and also introduced him to the world of professional photography.
By the age of 18 Kaz received several awards for his sports and landscape photography. During his senior year in high school, Kaz was given the opportunity to be head photographer for an emerging magazine in San Diego. It was this experience that solidified Kaz's dream of making his passion a living.
Today, Kaz travels tens of thousands of miles each year across all of North America capturing stunning landscapes and distinct architecture. People are naturally drawn to his unique visual perspective that captures brilliant color, rhythmic patterns, and magnificent lighting."
Are these cringe-fueling artists statements in keeping with the impression of your work, or is your work an attempt at projecting your artists statement into reality?
