I don't know how long you've been doing this for 'nor do I care. The intent of this post isn't to detract you but just from my point of view.
I'll mainly talk about technical details because that's what I do.
The processing on a lot of these is kind of flat and uninteresting and so are some of the subjects.
The Wide angle shots with the polariser are really distracting, the lack of compensation really draws my eyes to the dark blob in the corner, if you're going to shoot digital and wide angle, you'll need to learn how to process to avoid that.
>>3008673This one bugs my autism a little. As far as I can see there is no reason at all for a 1/4000 shutter speed. You were shooting wide angle again the subject isn't moving.
>>3008674This is much the same, another high shutter speed/ISO for no real reason.
>>3008677This is where I'm going to step in and be a total bully for a minute because my autism when it comes to panorama shots just can't contain itself. Compositionally, it just doesn't work. The horizon is tilted it makes me feel like I'm falling off the side of a cliff. There's so much orange negative space in the sky that I'm not really sure if it's needed, not when I look at the bottom and see people in the shot who have no feet.
Don't be scared to change your perspective to get a shot, It'll make a world of difference. Also the nuclear aftermath processing just isn't my cup of tea.
All that aside, the bully's a little bit strong in the thread and a little unjustified. Learn how to use the exposure triangle and in bright light avoid using high ISO. Look up the reciprocal shutter speed rule and you'll learn the acceptable limits for handholding your shot. If you're going to shoot stopped down stuff and digital, try paying attention to things like sensor dust and how you're changing your lenses.
These are fine for a casual photo trip, but I'd put in some effort to learn the exposure triangle before doing the same again.
