>>3008810Natives in the ghetto of Cambridge? Man up you fucking bed wetter.
Anyhoo, shit, No discernible order or expression or moment. Boots bag pulls the eye to it. Delete this.
>>3008812Sort of interesting for half a second. I am a sucker for a frame in a frame. |However the numbers and letters carry too much visual weight. Found myself reading them and not exploring the image. Beware
>>3008813Shit. Eye goes to the bright woman in white then out the top of the frame. What is this a photo of?
>>3008823Shit. Shit shit shit shit.
As before avoid text, it carries a fuck ton of visual weight and the viewer will end up reading it.
Also WHY THE FUCK are the bins the most prominent part of the image. Are they the subject?
>>3008838Slightly interesting, like the movement, bin ruins it. Maybe better in B&W?
I can't look at any more, I am getting upset.
Look, fair play for getting out there and taking photographs, that puts you above 90% of this board. That said some super basic stuff to think about.
1. Get closer, fill the frame with your subject. Way to many of your shots have way too much fuck all in them. Many I am not even sure what they are a photo of.
2 The eye is drawn to the brightest and highest contrast part of an image. You need to make sure your subject follows this either by careful composition or editing. Take
>>3009034for example. The brightest part is the hard right of the frame so the eye goes there and straight out. Attached is my fast and dirty 10 second edit. Two shadows would have been better.
3. Avoid text unless the text is the subject. The brain loves to read and it will pull the eye in straight in. Image over.
