>>3008926Lol, he's dumb as shit
I can't specifically talk about every lens, but the 24 70 2.8, 70 200 f4, 55 1.8, 28 f2 and 85 1.4 all have their rear element pretty damn close to the rear mount (and definitely inside the mirror box on a dslr).
He's literally looked at photos and concocted imaginary non existent "faults" and hasn't addressed the fact the short flange allows non retrofocal wide angle lens design, something that negatively affects every lens wider than 40mm on dslr.
>severely gimped cameras are better than ungimped cameras because of the laws of optical physics. No you fat bald orphan.
Oh, let me grab my leica 90mm, pentax 135mm, sony minolta 400mm, canon 135mm, oh look at that, they all have empty voids before the rear element, despite them being designed by leica or for dslr.
Now let me grab my 35mm f2.8, huh look at that, the lens would fit completely inside the mirror box of a dslr, and outperforms canikon lenses weighing over 4 times as much.
That fat, unloved bumblefuck should sort his life out, he seems to spend the vast majority of his time being angry at sony for producing superior products.
