>>3009572kind of like a dour, unimaginative, thoroughly uninteresting version of franco fontano
the flat look is best if there's something to distinguish all the hills from each other (light, texture, color). It doesn't need to smack you in the face with contrast, it can be subtle, but these just look drab.
you should work on your post process, these look like sooc middle gray crap
also that power line looks weird at the top, not sure if it's a focus issue or what but against the gray sky those kinds of technical problems are noticeable
the framing on the first 3 is OK though
>>3009582>muh grimey urbexno thanks
these just look like a flickr snaps dump from a bolder-than-usual tourist
>>3009585 is the only one with anything interesting going on (statement next to landscape) but it still looks like shit>>3009587don't quit faggot, if your photos suck your only option is to git gud. most people are shitty early on.
