Over the last year of comparing film to digital in terms of size and quality.
I realize something that might make comparing the two easier.
It makes sense for me and made sense for the people who don't know jack shit.
>Keep in mind this is just how I see it, it is NOT an official way to look at the two
>film's massive dymanic range will always change the factors of quality
>as well as the sensor in the digital camera
But personal a layman term
Here we go:
>110mm=16megapixels
>APS=24 megapixels
>35mm=35 megapixels
>127mm=40 megapixels
>120mm=60 megapixels
>4x5=525megapixels
Now of course film doesn't grow to the size of the megapixels
but visually I see it as that by the appearance of the film.
>they will never be pictures quality of 525 megapixels anytime soon
>However 4x5 will currently take it place.