>>3013510>tools to assist manual focus are pointless Because real artists are happy with missed focus? Faggot.
>graphs and numbers are as good a representation of an image as an exact preview of the imageNice logic, try hard faggot
>pictures in the dark look bad unless they're astroHave you ever left the house, faggot
>reading a couple of sentences about how aperture works is as useful as seeing an exact preview of your imageNo it isn't, you cringelord faggot
>dof preview isn't flawed at all on a dslrPersonally i love trying to see if i've got hyperfocal set right at f11 on a dslr, reminds me of trying to look through the diy limo tint on my citroen saxo.
>light hitting the rear screen of my camera isn't something I've ever experienced That answers the earlier question, no, you have not left your home. Faggot
>i don't understand lens designWell do some reading you little cum guzzler, start by comparing the weight, speed, price and sharpness of the sony 28mm, then try and work out how sony managed to make the sharpest and fastest 28mm on the market at half the weight and size of any dslr 28mm.
If you're going to form a rebuttal, first i expect you to explain how a light meter is more useful than an exact image preview & light meter. Faggot.
>>3013854>clue: the majority of professionals don't use a system that only got professional lenses in the last yearHoly shit homie, next you're gonna tell me there's more 2016 minis on the road than 2017 ones.Das wild
But a huge amount of pros HAVE invested in sony, at least in europe, talk to the guys at your local stores, sony is flying off the shelves for anything other than entry level kits, which is parents buying camera for their cuntspawn.
Op, go to a store, compare a camera with an evf to a dslr, get them to show you neat stuff like focus peaking and focus magnification, and make sure the evf is set to show image preview, I've not shown a friend my sony and have them not marvel at the evf.
