>>3016294>>3016228There's nothing wrong with Ektar.
These assclowns have created some kind of meme about it being difficult to expose because they are lab-scanning plebs who don't know how to correct colour.
Ektar is a great film, super fucking sharp, it just doesn't have cruise-control-for-cool boosted reds and flat contrast like portra, and you should be scanning it yourself with a DSLR.
<table class="exif" id="exif1486334939015"><tr><td colspan="2">
Camera-Specific Properties:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">
</td></tr><tr><td>Equipment Make</td><td>Canon</td></tr><tr><td>Camera Model</td><td>Canon EOS 550D</td></tr><tr><td>Camera Software</td><td>GIMP 2.8.14</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">
</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">
Image-Specific Properties:</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">
</td></tr><tr><td>Horizontal Resolution</td><td>72 dpi</td></tr><tr><td>Vertical Resolution</td><td>72 dpi</td></tr><tr><td>Comment</td><td>
</td></tr><tr><td>Projection</td><td>Rectilinear (0)
</td></tr><tr><td>FOV</td><td>9 x 6
</td></tr><tr><td>Ev</td><td>13.60</td></tr><tr><td>Color Space Information</td><td>sRGB</td></tr><tr><td colspan="2">
</td></tr></table>
