[12 / 4 / ?]
>considering using film again after a long time, for some long exposure work
>research about different emulsions
>check flickr to see peoples results
>almost all photos are mundane, very boring, uninspired garbage, 90% is literal test shot tier
Here is one example, this is supposed to be a film for very "serious" photographers btw:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/1444945@N21/pool/
When I open a flickr pool of a random ancient or entry level DSLR I see much more decent shots. Why are filmfags, at least on flickr, so overwhelmingly bad? Also, why do non hipsters waste their money and time on analogue snapshits?
>research about different emulsions
>check flickr to see peoples results
>almost all photos are mundane, very boring, uninspired garbage, 90% is literal test shot tier
Here is one example, this is supposed to be a film for very "serious" photographers btw:
https://www.flickr.com/groups/1444945@N21/pool/
When I open a flickr pool of a random ancient or entry level DSLR I see much more decent shots. Why are filmfags, at least on flickr, so overwhelmingly bad? Also, why do non hipsters waste their money and time on analogue snapshits?