>>3027013I like the blue of the building, looks almost cartoon-like. Good comp, would consider bringing the highlights of the clouds down to play into the look a bit more.
>>3027033>>3027034These have a nice atmosphere.
>>3027039Don't find this particularly interesting but it's well taken and composed.
>>3027059The colours are not good, unless it's for the cover of a 90's grunge album. Your iso is VERY high. Generally speaking, the higher iso, the less effectively the camera renders colour. Revisit your exposure technique.
>>3027062Don't normally go in for these kinds of landscapes but this is beautiful. Love the lavender tone in the sky picking up the plants in the field. Jealous of how that must have smelled.
>>3027072This is decent, but for very minimalist photos the composition is king and has to be incredibly strong. If you haven't, try it in black and white.
I like the negative space though.
>>3027104The face looks oversharpened, which kills natural skintones imo. If you're using the clarity slider to achieve this, try either using less or none, and get familiar with using the sharpen tool.
>>3027160Composition is a little weak and the colours are a little crushed for my taste. You captured a cool moment, though.
>>3027234I like this.
>>3027279Missed focus but it's not such a big problem since this is a nice photo. There are some nice colours in the photo but they're not rendered particularly well with the exposure. I would consider black and white.
>>3027280Something very weird going on here with colours. Don't bring the bottom of the black rgb curve up so high.
The fake depth of field effect (if that's what it is?) looks very bad - don't use it. Composition-wise it's ok, but not all that interesting.
>>3027330This is really nice. Excellent job. Great composition, great tones, great sharpness.
