>>3030334The two near the bottom with the girl (laying down with the blue and orange wall/with the red wall and blue photo). I see what you were trying to do but when scrolling down, I did not enjoy ending on those.
The first five make sense, I see the focus being the man with the crutch and its relation to the individual appendages and the chair seems to put an end to that line of thought.
Many of the images afterwards try to juxtapose body parts with objects or scenes with bodyparts to scenes with objects. Some of these comparisons are pretty obvious.
Then there's a string of shots of mannequin hands along the same lines as the human hands, I like the use of the jizz to transition from one thought to the next. Is that supposed to be like one of those cuts in film that uses a similar shape/object in two scenes to anchor the transition?
Is the image of the toilet paper roll related to the one of the slice of tree after? I'm assuming so due to the similar angle/shapes/colors
You then have some more body images and then more juxtaposition this time of body texture to object texture (surfaces). Mixed in here and earlier, then ending with the dogs and the couple right after are images of couples on top of each other.
In terms of reordering I would recommend seeing what they look like sliced together. Right now the juxtapositions/subjects are grouped together in a very defined way. I don't have an answer for how to do this but I guess I see enough similarities between the blocks of content that individuals/pairs from each block could be combined and I think this would strengthen the comparisons you are making between the blocks. However, I wouldn't think combining obvious pairs makes sense, and to a degree this is already happening and why I think reordering might help. Near the bottom before the dogs you have a bunch of skin and rock juxtapositions right next to each other that could be spread out into the other content.
