>>3036268if your shot sucks enough that you're wondering if fucking it up improves it then maybe you should forget about that shot entirely
>>3037970I think it's fine for what it is
>>3037898boring, underexposed, leaning sideways, uncompelling composition that could be fixed with some cropping to isolate the towers but won't solve the power lines being in the way
>>3037714cool shot however I'd say too much DOF mostly for the foreground, would have been better with a smaller aperture maybe
>>3037630having some foreground is good as long as it doesn't obliterate a good quarter of your subject holy shit it's just irritating to look at, almost makes you want to move your head to the left
>>3037533>babbysfirstpicture.cr2That's great, now go outside and look for something worth shooting
>>3037427>1/60 sec>ISO 2500both overexposed and too grainy at the same time, well done. Also if you shoot someone try shooting more than a couple of shots so you can find a frame where they look decent.
>>3037425too much sky, not sure B&W was the best choice
>>3037238>one of my favsJesus fucking Christ go outside kid, there isn't anything on your classroom table that will make a great shot
>>3037197>filmfags and their grainy high ISO shots where you can't see shitthink about it, the man's face takes a good proportion of the frame (for a face that is) and you couldn't recognise him if you knew him because it's so fucking grainy and blurry. Filmfags, when will they learn...
