>>3037060I wouldn't mind harsh criticism, but I'd first have to come up with stuff that I could really stand behind, that I felt had some proper ethos behind it.
I'm getting there slowly, and sometimes receive useful critique from art friends, though of course they're more afraid to hurt my feelings than someone who is well paid to do that.
Are you >
>>3030820 this guy?
I think courses like his can probably be very good, but at the same time, if you have the commitment to spend that kind of cash on a course you would probably be able to teach yourself the same stuff from a more varied selection of outlooks than his from what I've heard, quite narrow one.
