>>3040493good colours though
>1/80 sec>ISO 100good settings but it's not quite low light, it's kind of at the boundary
>>3040691cool effect, I should try it with a more interesting subject
>>3040722keep your aperture at the max, keep your ISO to the lowest and adjust your exposure time
When it gets dark if your exposure time has to go below 1/80 sec or else it gets too low then keep your exposure at 1/80 sec and set your ISO to Auto (possibly with EV -2, or so I like to do to keep highlights).
The only reason you'd want to mess with aperture is to get less depth of field, so generally you wouldn't touch it, unless you hate depth of field.
>f/10.0>1/6 sec yet still sharpyou used a tripod I suppose? But yeah, if you didn't you'd have to fix that ridiculous aperture
>>3040731Shoot actual interesting things holy fuck how obvious is that?? You wouldn't spend ten seconds gazing in awe at a crack in a wall in real life, so why do you want the viewers of your picture to do just that??
>>3040740crop, and resize before posting
>>3040752should have kept your camera leveled to keep those walls parallel to each other
>>3040768the composition is a bit lacking but somehow the result isn't unpleasant
>>3040769boring and underexposed, it looks like it was shot in the shadow of an abandoned strip mall
>>3040384aimed too high, you don't aim for the top because it fucks the perspective
>>3041175this is a recent pictures thread nigga not a post babby's first crappy shots
>>3041281horrendous pp, not even looking at your other shot, they clearly all suck from the thumbnails anyway. Shoot actual interesting things.
STOP TRYING TO MAKE UNINTERESTING THINGS BECOME INTERESTING, IT CLEARLY DOESN'T WORK FOR YOU, PEOPLE!
