>>3041956I would wager it's film shot in some total trashcam like a disposable, or more likely with some russian lense wide open and focused at infinity, on neg film with a shitty lab scan.
I'd labour the point of the shitty lab scan, because the dynamic range in the shot is fucked, and there's a lot of noise reduction going on, and overexposing to shoot the lense at a wide aperture would give a neg too dense for a lab scan to deal with well.
The only other option, which could be indicated by the bad DR and NR, would be some trash tier digital p&s, however I think they would never give a file this low in saturation or this overexposed, and I can't think of any with a lense this bad.
