>>3043888>no need to be demeaning I'm not being demeaning and I am unsure of how you came to that conclusion.
>"this could have been done way better"This is a shallow reading.
>>3043933I'll be honest I do not know the technical end of why but it's interesting to get a glimpse of it here. If you have an article handy I'd love to have it.
In terms your suggestion I already do it that way. When converting to web I downscale->convert to 8 bit ->convert to sRGB
Overall it's series based on artificial landscapes. There's supposed to be a tension between an alien landscape being terraformed into habitable or a terrestrial landscape decaying. The introduction of the pipes and building should be obvious in this context. It simply work as an atmospheric processor or general manufacturing.
>>3044023The only way to get these clouds is to shoot underwater. It's been frustrating in it's limiting of quality. Similarly dof is an issue and since there's quite a bit of movement in the majority of these stacking is not an option. I enjoy the tinfoil but I will give painting it a go. It's worth a try.
>>3044132probably. I am no where near any sort of meaningful curation.
>>3043877I should add Kim Keevers to this list.
