>>3045345eh, if there was a view to the outer world, like anything past the flowers showing the perspective from there would be great, but this is just a golden green mess
>>3045357terrible, why? a meaningless photo of a pole with a light so blown out it makes you squint
>>3045372like clouds or sunsets, stay the hell away from cars unless you can do something interesting with one of the most cliche subjects in all of photography. plus the composition and color pallette are terrible
>>3045373nothing here that should catch my eye like a street photograph should, unless you want the subject to be the bright white sky stabbing into half of the photo. you've got perfectly good shadows on the bottom to do half the work for you and you ignored that and tried to force architecture and street photography
>>3045399not good, dont use your kit lens for portraits, the sharp details that should be his face are soft up close and suffer from chrom aberration, also, the composition is terrible, the main subject is right in the center of the photo, fix most of this by cropping basically the entire right side out and make it a 1:1 ratio, also, be more patient and wait for better facial expressions
>>3045414pointless, youve got 1.21MBs of nothing here. youre using a fucking telephoto to capture a musical device and not anything interesting, like the person using it. at the very least you could have captured movement by lowering the shutter speed and waiting for the fag to go full sperg on the device. ALSO, the processing is weird, skin tone is alright but everything else is a mix of purple and blue. The composition is fucked, your "subject" has a blurry fucking hand right in front of it, keep going at it though
