>>3052475I forgot to mention warmth of accommodation. Most of the time, when you want every part of the house to be accessible, the smaller house provides greater WoA.
For examble, if you're focused on a task in the kitchen and you need to see what's going on in the loungeroom and the first bedroom at the same time, the smaller house will make that easier to acheive.
If you're new to houses, however, and not yet capable of basic "living in a house" skills like making a space an expression of your own style, cooperating with others in close proximity to you, or keeping a home clean and tidy; and you have a lot of money to throw around, the McMansion enables you to ignore developing a lot of these skills and just extoll the virtues of living with as little WoA as possible. Intimacy amd sharing and ease of communication aren't the reasons people chose to live in houses in the first place anyway. You want that sense of isolation.
Big empty rooms are everywhere, and you can simply switch rooms for different simple tasks, rather than making any of them truly function effectively.
I mean, why bother keeping a 200SQF room really neat and tidy when you've got 12800SQF to play with? Sure, the 1600SQF dining hall can get a little noisy, but you can use it whenever you want. Can you imagine being one of those plebs who has to actually go outside, or set up extra furniture when they run out of dining space?!
WoA is a meme for cucks, I shouldn't have even brought it up. I mean, you can always just shut doors in your big house if you want more "WoA", right? I mean who even cares that it takes 1 minute to walk 22m down a flight of stairs to get from my wardrobe to the laundry, compared to 11m and 1/4 minute in the smaller house? How often do you have to wash clothes anyway?
