/p/ - Photography » Thread #3056078

[326 / 57 / ?]

377KiB, 1600x1200, a8ea7ca66dbf42ae3f8b85090f87e648.jpg

QTDDTOT

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 01:50:52 No.3056078 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3056079 >>3056218 >>3057150 >>3059380 >>3060861 >>3062201 >>3062268 >>3065663 >>3067190 >>3068116 >>3068611 >>3072655 >>3073004 >>3073025 >>3073057 >>3073625

Questions That Don't Deserve Their Own Thread

>simple questions
>dumb questions
>noob questions
>pro questions

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 01:58:28 No.3056079 Report

Quoted By: >>3056080

>>3056078
when someone leaves a note no your windshield looking to buy your car, how much do you ask for over the going price?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:01:44 No.3056080 Report

Quoted By: >>3056084

>>3056079
depends how open you are to selling it
>not very open
3-5k over
>very open
1k over

chances are he's hoping for a bargain

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:03:50 No.3056081 Report

Quoted By: >>3059508

>bought canon eos 1200d
>bought canon ef-s 24mm f.28 lens
>aim is to shoot the aurora

"Remember to take all filters off the lenses prior to shooting, including a UV filter, or you will end up with an undesirable aberration on all your images."

do lens coming with filters already on them? i thought that was something you had to add.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:14:03 No.3056084 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056080
>depends how open you are to selling it
just got all the maintenance issues of owning an older "luxury" shitbox under control so not a motivated seller. could get something newer but wouldnt be fully loaded with leather heated seats and shit.
>very open
also broke as shit in my final year at uni
its getting harder to be the blue collar slob trying to blend in with the trust fund kiddies

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:19:37 No.3056088 Report

Quoted By: >>3056097 >>3058116 >>3058219

I recently took an interest in photography after shooting with my parent's camera during summer vacation (I'm still in high school). I recently bought an Olympus Trip 35 because I like film photography and want to start from basics.
What are your shooting tips? It's a pretty simple camera, so I was thinking of bringing with me wherever I go to snap cool shots as I see them. I was planning on making a little "High School" series of photographs sort of chronicling the experience before I graduate.
Also, I shot a few rolls, and although some were good, a lot of pictures were blurry, even though I checked the focus ring. Any suggestions for that?

Anyways, thanks for the help, any input is greatly appreciated?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:35:53 No.3056097 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056088
My biggest tip would be to literally just shoot. Fuck up shots and learn from your mistakes, that's all you can really do.

fucking cuck !!L1lx81epp6B

fucking cuck !!L1lx81epp6B Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:36:21 No.3056098 Report

Quoted By: >>3056217

My 32RH transmission on my 4.0L '97 TJ lurches every time I put it under initial load (as in, shift from neutral to reverse or drive). What's the deal? Is my transmission mount crooked? Is it a suspension problem?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_1173.jpg, 2MiB, 5184x3456

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:38:35 No.3056101 Report

Quoted By: >>3056103

What style/subcategory of photography is this? (1/2)

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0140.jpg, 378KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:41:12 No.3056103 Report

Quoted By: >>3056105 >>3056318

>>3056101

(2/2) Found both of these on some urban exploring page on Tumblr

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO HS_1174.png, 803KiB, 918x607

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 02:46:38 No.3056105 Report

Quoted By: >>3056206 >>3056318 >>3059620

>>3056103

What type of photography is this? (1/2)

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 07:16:15 No.3056206 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056105
Its just out of focus images of nothing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 07:18:03 No.3056207 Report

Quoted By: >>3056214 >>3056217 >>3059509

What filter can I use if there is a lot of haze/smog I want to make clearer?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 07:43:07 No.3056214 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056207
A polarising filter could cut the reflected light from the smog but i'm not exactly sure.
Theres a dehaze feature in lightroom, you could also try doing multiple/long exposures if the smog is intermittent and blending the differences.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 07:51:33 No.3056217 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056207
Black and white with a yellow or red filter to remove blue. With digital you're kind of fucked, but Lightroom's dehaze brush can work miracles in some instances like anon said.

>>3056098
Change the blinker fluid

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image006.jpg, 82KiB, 1080x1080

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 07:57:02 No.3056218 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056078
ohh a drifting thread

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 13 Apr 2017 14:09:52 No.3056318 Report

Quoted By: >>3059620

>>3056103
>>3056105
Millions of images like this under the hashtag 'bokeh' on the various social and picture aggregator sites.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 21:04:42 No.3056992 Report

Quoted By: >>3056999 >>3059728

Is it better to shoot sports in in JPEG? In other words, is the faster shooting speed worth the quality drop?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 21:41:05 No.3056999 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056992
If your prints don't need to be bigger than a magazine than yes

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO goldring[1].jpg, 22KiB, 300x395

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 22:05:20 No.3057011 Report

Quoted By: >>3057022 >>3057023 >>3057031 >>3060886

what's the Nikon gold ring actually made of?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 22:43:29 No.3057022 Report

Quoted By: >>3057027

>>3057011
actual 18k gold. the L from Canon's lens are just red ink.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 22:46:31 No.3057023 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057011
this needs a serious answer

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 22:58:20 No.3057027 Report

Quoted By: >>3057030

>>3057022
yes but the secret ingredient in the red ink is the blood of a sacrificed Canon factory service center technician

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 23:04:27 No.3057030 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057027
Now I get the why they are so slow even for a minor clean up

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 14 Apr 2017 23:11:16 No.3057031 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057011

actual gold

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO laptops.jpg, 65KiB, 656x659

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 05:14:43 No.3057150 Report

Quoted By: >>3057358 >>3057366 >>3057739 >>3059715 >>3063197

>>3056078
not sure if this counts as /gear/ so i'll post here:

pls halp me pick a laptop, /p/

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 14:13:50 No.3057358 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057150
pls

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 14:32:05 No.3057366 Report

Quoted By: >>3057369 >>3057436 >>3057911

>>3057150
Dell is only headache. Asus is good. just buy you a Mac.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 14:36:29 No.3057369 Report

Quoted By: >>3057795 >>3060645

>>3057366
do you think it is "better" to edit photos on a 4K/UHD display than a 1080p/FHD display? i haven't found a consensus one way of the other; it's about 50/50 saying it's really helpful or just a meme

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 17:04:22 No.3057436 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057366
>just buy you a Mac.
t. gullible brand whore

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 22:35:57 No.3057573 Report

Quoted By: >>3059510

Where the fuck is last years photo book.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMGP0735.jpg, 942KiB, 1600x1064

Anonymous Sat 15 Apr 2017 23:01:02 No.3057590 Report

Quoted By: >>3057689

At racing events, there's usually a separate fenced off area between the spectator accessible areas and the track limits, as well as a few small elevated grandstands. These areas are for photographers, paying a heavy premium to get access to a few specifically located fence cutouts and elevated areas that all the other photographers paying this premium get.

The last race I went to, Long Beach GP, entry was around $60, and the photo pass entry was $290. There's hundreds of these photographers, and they're all walking around with a huge amount of gear.

My question is who the fuck are these people? I'm guessing there's a few amateurs in the mix, and I'm guessing the different racing series each have a few photographers, the track probably has it's own photographers, teams probably have a photographer every now and then, but it seems like there's a lot of photographers out there that I haven't accounted for. Are there a lot more hobbyists than I expect doing this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 02:06:56 No.3057679 Report

Quoted By:

I've been considering getting in to photography for a couple of months now, in that time I've seriously considered getting a Contax T2 as I've loved what I've seen from it. I've mostly just been watching and reading tutorials as I'm essentially a beginner. Do you guys have any recommendations starting with film? Any required readings or useful videos to watch on photography in general? I'll mostly be doing street shooting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 02:22:43 No.3057683 Report

Quoted By: >>3057705 >>3057712

with a full frame or crop sensor is there ever a time it benefits you to go over f11?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 02:39:03 No.3057689 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057590
Street tracks are different in that the amount of space is limited. Go to any of the real road courses, especially the older ones, and you can get barrier-side spectator areas that are only a few feet removed from where the media stand. And there's no need to fight over elbow room either: you can stand wherever you'd like, and there's plenty of space for everyone.

LBGP is easily accessible for most people though, so you'll see a lot of them crowding around.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 03:13:28 No.3057705 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057683
try shooting macro or product with f11. so much shallow dof

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 03:31:13 No.3057712 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057683

Sometimes you need more depth of field.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 04:14:12 No.3057739 Report

Quoted By: >>3058139

>>3057150
Dell XPS my man

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 06:43:18 No.3057795 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057369
I would personally go the 4K, more real estate in PS since the PS panels on all sides are smaller. Try editing in 1080p vs 720p mode.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 11:43:32 No.3057908 Report

Quoted By:

Canon EOS 450D + Canon EF 28-90mm or Canon 1100D + 18-55mm?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 11:56:23 No.3057911 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057366
Spot the clueless mci.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 18:04:38 No.3058040 Report

Quoted By: >>3058113 >>3058226

Some questions from someone completely new to the hobby:

>do you guys ever use the automatic mode of taking pictures?

>the selection of lenses is quite overwhelming and I don't know what to look for. How do you guys choose the lens depending on the type of photos you want to take?

>do you keep your dslr with you at all times? If not, do you specifically take some time each week to go out just to look for good places for photos?

Thanks.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2163.jpg, 806KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 20:32:11 No.3058113 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058040
>do you guys ever use the automatic mode of taking pictures?
No lol. Aperture priority is best for dynamic settings. Manual if you're doing landscapes or long exposure crap.
>the selection of lenses is quite overwhelming and I don't know what to look for. How do you guys choose the lens depending on the type of photos you want to take?
A google search will get you many blog posts about choosing your first few lenses, if you have none. If your camera came with some kit lenses, use those until you figure out what you want to do, then buy lenses specific to your needs. Don't spend money you don't need to.
>do you keep your dslr with you at all times? If not, do you specifically take some time each week to go out just to look for good places for photos?
I usually keep mine in my car in case of impromptu trips to interesting places. Otherwise, I try to schedule trips with one or two photog friends a few times a month.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 20:38:21 No.3058116 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056088
Analyze your shots too. Compare them to photos that you really like. Dont be like me and over-research everything

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 21:19:16 No.3058139 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057739
I second dis.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20170408_115031.jpg, 549KiB, 1728x972

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 22:39:36 No.3058209 Report

Quoted By:

How far can an s7's camera take me?

Pic related

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 22:41:37 No.3058211 Report

Quoted By:

D700: cop or not?

!P3141593qY

!P3141593qY Sun 16 Apr 2017 23:01:12 No.3058219 Report

Quoted By: >>3058221

>>3056088
when shooting film document the conditions (light) and camera settings, so you can get to know what settings to use depening on the scene

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 23:10:05 No.3058221 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058219
I've seen people respond to this kid but is everyone dumb the Olympus trip is 100% auto. You just point and shoot.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2936.jpg, 322KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 23:26:25 No.3058225 Report

Quoted By: >>3058400

>at /p/'s suggestion bought a canon eos 1200d
>bought a ef-s f2.8 24mm lens
>aim to shoot aurora
>none around atm
>practice shooting night sky

what is wrong with this picture? how can i get the stars more in focus? hints and tips please. i'll throw up a picture

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 23:31:57 No.3058226 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058040
>Auto
I use manual but I believe the last strawpoll on the subject had an overwhelming majority of /p/ users on aperture priority.

>Lens
Find pictures you like, figure out what they where shot on - grab the closest thing you can afford.

>Habits
Shoot something everyday is what they say, even if its just a cellphone shot of a houseplant.

I keep a chinese action cam in my bag when I don't feel like dragging around my big camera.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 16 Apr 2017 23:34:37 No.3058227 Report

Quoted By: >>3058242

shouild i buy a6000? with 35mm f1.8?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2932.jpg, 403KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 00:05:18 No.3058241 Report

Quoted By:

i think the moon phase kinda fucked me a bit. was hoping to get more stars, also i now realise i need to go further out to really escape the light pollution.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 00:07:59 No.3058242 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058227
no

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 950[0].png, 2MiB, 1200x1200

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 01:11:04 No.3058276 Report

Quoted By: >>3058277 >>3058300

sup fellas

i'm currently majoring in multimedia production and took an interest in photography

i just got out of an internship and i'm pretty much broke, currently looking for a job that pays a minimum wage. i know some of the basics of photography and how to handle a semi professional camera like the likes of nikon d3300 and a canon t4i (which is the one my friend has the the one we use in class, respectively). so I have 3 cameras in mind: the nikon D3300 which I'm used to and took a couple of good shots (which costs BRL 2K, the body + a 18-55mm lens), a T5 for 1,6k with also a 18-55mm lens and the T5i for 2,2k, same lens.

the thing is, even though the T5 and T5i boasts the same image quality and a couple of differences in its body, the D3300 is better than a T5 and cheaper than a T5i, even though the T5i it's more of a favorite.

which one should I buy?

even though the T5i is more expensive, i'd be willing to buy it if it means that I won't be having to change cameras once I get further into photography, professionally.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 01:12:22 No.3058277 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058276
>and the one we use
fix'd

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 02:10:36 No.3058299 Report

Quoted By: >>3058300

I feel like a dick, but this just sold for 250 usd on a local student art site.. Not a art student, but I feel like that power lines add nothing and it's not in focus.. Perhaps I don't get it or someone wants to support student art

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO ughhhh.jpg, 604KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 02:12:31 No.3058300 Report

Quoted By: >>3058303 >>3058330 >>3059512

>>3058299
Said photo

>>3058276
Have you looked into used mirrorless cameras? If you want 4k they'd be your best bet or a used canon 70D

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 02:22:03 No.3058303 Report

Quoted By: >>3058305

>>3058300
i've never trusted used tech-goods, specially cameras in regards to lens conservation and clicks amount.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 02:23:20 No.3058305 Report

Quoted By: >>3058326

>>3058303
btw. like I said, price is of matter since i'll be making a minimum wage and a 70D is just too much expensive

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 03:46:50 No.3058326 Report

Quoted By: >>3058329

>>3058305
B&H and KAH are both excellent places to buy used gear with that come with warranties along with being heavily checked. I got my Leica M2 through B&H and it was as under rated in condition.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 03:49:48 No.3058329 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058326
i'm sorry, I'm brazilian. i'm sure those stores are out of my league

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 03:50:17 No.3058330 Report

Quoted By: >>3058353

>>3058300
lmao the powerline that goes right through the horizon

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 03:51:19 No.3058331 Report

Quoted By: >>3058363 >>3058378 >>3059288 >>3059303

>Full Frame
>Everyone talks about it
W-What is it and why is it important

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 05:45:16 No.3058353 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058330
And it sold for 250 bucks...Sadly it gets worse with the others.. I can't even.. But this was a great push to sell prints with the tagline of me being a student...

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 06:19:31 No.3058363 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058331
muh sensor size

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 07:18:51 No.3058378 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058331
It means the sensor is the same size as a standard 35mm film frame.

It's important because most old lenses and most modern professional level lenses were made to cover exactly this size.

The only drawback is that they are more expensive than smaller sensors.
But the differences are getting smaller as technology advances.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 08:03:43 No.3058387 Report

Quoted By: >>3059261 >>3059298

Is Canon's autofocus better?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 08:22:21 No.3058394 Report

Quoted By: >>3059261

Anybody can recommend a good monitor for photo editing etc under 250euro?

!P3141593qY

!P3141593qY Mon 17 Apr 2017 08:51:01 No.3058400 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058225
>how can i get the stars more in focus?
make a Bahtinov mask for your lens and focus on a bright star with live view at maximum magnification

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 16:21:42 No.3058564 Report

Quoted By: >>3058565

Crop freely or by aspect ratio? I've always cropped autistically by aspect ratio when working with digital, but recently attended a darkroom course and realized that 1) chances are you're gonna crop from 3:2 because paper has different dimensions and 2) you're probably getting ballpark ratios at most if you crop

So has my autism been stupid all along?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 17 Apr 2017 16:27:56 No.3058565 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058564
For very moderate crops, such as to compensate for viewfinder inaccuracy and optical crappiness towards the edges, I try to retain the aspect ratio. If I'm discarding lots of stuff because of being at minimum focus distance or something, I usually prefer 1:1 just because it looks better on wide screens than portrait orientation does.

Your problem is making up a stupid rule and then following it like it meant something. So yeah, clever people don't try to avoid walking on a crack on the sidewalk.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 14:08:26 No.3059124 Report

Quoted By:

Can I get "roll thread" picture please.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 16:28:32 No.3059177 Report

Quoted By: >>3059261 >>3059295

I don't understand nothing about photos, camera and other things.
I want to build drone to spy people, normally drones are equipped with gopro clones, which have wide view. So, if I want to spy on people, I'd need a different kind of camera, right? Something with a tight lens or a bigger focal distance.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 20:25:27 No.3059257 Report

Quoted By: >>3059261 >>3059293

TIFFS !!
what image viewer do you guys use for previews of big TIFF files ?
i like to browse the film scann tiffs then open on ps etc.
what can you recommend me ? windows 7 OS

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 20:30:55 No.3059261 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059177
>bigger focal length
you can look up google for focal lenght comparisons

>>3058394
idk maybe dell ? dell is always good i believe

>>3058387
all DSLR autofocus are good/ fast
but the cameras are getting shit. if you're not shooting nascar then get any camera with decent af speed

also need this to be answered pls
>>3059257
>>3059257
>>3059257
>>3059257

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO a79b6cfe6d37160f87d5bf10beacd022.jpg, 1MiB, 1590x1196

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 21:38:24 No.3059288 Report

Quoted By: >>3059291 >>3066280

>>3058331

It's important to help reduce noise in comparison to a comparable crop sensor.

Also the same FOV on a crop sensor will have more distortion than on a full frame since the focal length will be shorter. This is important for portraiture and architecture mainly, however I'd say it's just important full stop.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 21:45:41 No.3059291 Report

Quoted By: >>3059303

>>3059288
>Also the same FOV on a crop sensor will have more distortion than on a full frame since the focal length will be shorter.

This is wrong.

Focal length doesn't cause distortion, subject distance does.
Same FOV means same subject distance so same distortion.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 21:47:40 No.3059293 Report

Quoted By: >>3059301

>>3059257
Haven't tried it with TIFFs, but FastStone is very fast with (big) raw images and I'd imagine with TIFFs as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 21:51:48 No.3059295 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059177
I doubt you'll have much luck with a telephoto lens on a drone.
The image will be extremely shaky and hard to aim.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 22:00:20 No.3059298 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058387
>Is Canon's autofocus better?

High-end Canons and Nikons are very closely matched.
Maybe Canon's high-end is a fraction better but it's barely noticeable.

The difference between high-end and low-end models of either brands is much bigger.
There are also considerable differences between generations.

ie: camera model matters far more than brand.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 22:07:13 No.3059301 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059293
thank you...but is it
>FastStone Image Viewer
or
>FastStone MaxView
?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 18 Apr 2017 22:12:17 No.3059303 Report

Quoted By: >>3059370 >>3059514

>>3059291

If we are referring to the comparison of sensor formats in relation to optical distortion to somebody who has no clue - it is simply easier to explain it in these simple terms.

Also you yourself are confusing angle of view and field of view. They are different. Angle of view is in relation to the lens only. Field of view is determined by the camera and lens combination.

>>3058331

https://photographylife.com/equivalent-focal-length-and-field-of-view/

Read this if you really care.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 01:02:16 No.3059370 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059303
>f we are referring to the comparison of sensor formats in relation to optical distortion to somebody who has no clue - it is simply easier to explain it in these simple terms.
Your words are pure disinformation. Same FOV never leads to perspective difference regardless of focal length. Reread your bullshit pls.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 01:32:07 No.3059380 Report

Quoted By: >>3059392

>>3056078
What's the best way to compress raw image files?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 01:55:27 No.3059392 Report

Quoted By: >>3059449

>>3059380
Convert to DNG with small or no thumbnail. It can be both lossy and lossless and it does not even look extremely lossy in lossy mode.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO boringmikucake.jpg, 172KiB, 644x720

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 02:17:37 No.3059399 Report

Quoted By: >>3059400 >>3059405 >>3059486 >>3059515

How do I photograph my son's birthday cake in a pleasing way?

It just looks boring and waxy. I swear, it's a delicious ice cream cake.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 02:19:53 No.3059400 Report

Quoted By: >>3059401 >>3059417

>>3059399

No flash, my man.

Also, don't let your son play with barbies or else he'll grow up into a queer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 02:22:20 No.3059401 Report

Quoted By: >>3059404

>>3059400
I didn't use the flash. I just put it next to a luxo lamp.

My son was conceived to Hatsune Miku music, so her presence on the cake is meaningful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 02:35:49 No.3059404 Report

Quoted By: >>3059407

>>3059401
use a natural light my friend, also try looking up for a reference in google

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 02:36:04 No.3059405 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059399
>How do I photograph my son's birthday cake in a pleasing way?
Use backdrop, arrange lighting builbs manually to your taste - no ceiling bulb!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 02:39:02 No.3059407 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059404
Well, it's nighttime now. So, in the morning, I guess.

Thank you for all the advice. I want the family to be impressed when they see it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 03:04:58 No.3059417 Report

Quoted By: >>3059419

>>3059400
What? He should use the flash because it's dark??

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 03:07:26 No.3059419 Report

Quoted By: >>3059431

>>3059417

then use natural light. front flash just makes everything look extra shiny and greasy. it's the worst possible lighting for food.

the best possible is a north-facing window with a silver reflector to add fill light.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 03:35:52 No.3059431 Report

Quoted By: >>3059433

>>3059419
>silver reflector
I'm too ghetto for this. Should I just put a lamp behind the thing?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 03:42:42 No.3059433 Report

Quoted By: >>3059441

>>3059431

aluminum foil works extremely well. don't use a lamp because it'll have a different color cast than the blue light coming from the sky.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 03:54:05 No.3059441 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059433
Bless. I'm going to get a good picture now, I think!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 04:04:56 No.3059449 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059392
TY anon

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 05:48:26 No.3059486 Report

Quoted By: >>3059504

>>3059399
This is a boy cake? Wtf?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 06:38:03 No.3059502 Report

Quoted By: >>3060649

hey /p/ shooting film for a long time, just into DSLR a couple months ago and the photos look flat as hell so i shot in RAW this past week and now i need to get photo processing software to finish my photos up.

>is adobe creative cloud worth getting?
>or just lightroom?
>should i/ where to torrent?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 06:49:02 No.3059504 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059486
Of course.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:17:33 No.3059508 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056081
No.yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:18:35 No.3059509 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056207
A facemask would filter the smoke away, try that

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:19:51 No.3059510 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057573
Up ur ass turn right

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:25:09 No.3059512 Report

Quoted By:

>>3058300
Yeah fucking modern art nonsense and all that

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:27:49 No.3059514 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059303
You are wrong pls focal length means no shit to distortion, phone cameras have focal lengths of a few mm yet are perfectly fine.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:29:46 No.3059515 Report

Quoted By: >>3059517

>>3059399
Ur son will browse 4chan all day just like his old man

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 07:56:40 No.3059517 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059515
Thank you.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO junk.jpg, 830KiB, 1000x1000

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 08:26:41 No.3059523 Report

Quoted By: >>3059603

Are there any tips to choosing a color filter for B&W tography? I lack vision, they all look good/bad to me :[

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Olympus OMD EM5 Mark2_Snapseed.jpg, 197KiB, 992x596

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 12:24:49 No.3059584 Report

Quoted By: >>3059639 >>3059647

My parents gave me their Olympus OM-D E-M5 ii since it's gathering dust, and I'm looking to get better and learn more about photography.

Is it good for a beginner? Is it awful in general? Why/Why not? Should I be looking at a non-stock lens if I'm going to be using it primarily for street photography?

Thanks in advance!

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 13:15:24 No.3059603 Report

Quoted By: >>3059605

>>3059523

That's because it's a shit photo with a limited color range.

Red is for that dramatic dark sky effect that so many artsy black and white photos have. Yellow and orange have a similar effect, just with different intensity.

Blue looks like shit 90% of the time but can make for dramatic portraits of crinkly brown people, and of architecture and shit at dusk.

Green is instant art and is pretty much the best one to use in most scenarios.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO yes.jpg, 326KiB, 1000x1050

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 13:29:15 No.3059605 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059603
wow you're right anon, green is bottom left

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 14:21:58 No.3059620 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056105
>>3056318

>tfw posted an experimental bokeh picture like this on Instagram
>first picture I had someone ask me for a print of

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 15:07:14 No.3059639 Report

Quoted By: >>3060087

>>3059584
Just use it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 15:22:03 No.3059647 Report

Quoted By: >>3060087

>>3059584
/p/ will shit on it for using a Micro Four-Thirds sensor ('cause memes, mostly), but it's a pretty good camera. probably a little complicated for someone completely new to photography, but ask your parents for the manual or download it online and just go out and shoot and you'll learn what all the buttons and dials do fairly quickly.

what kind of lens did it come with? and if you didn't already know, m43 cameras have a crop factor of 2x, so a 25mm lens on your Oly will be equivalent to a 50mm lens Full Frame/35mm camera (which is the default when people write or refer to focal lengths)

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 17:02:48 No.3059715 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057150
Middle, ssd will make it fast as hell, especially opening, importing and exporting.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 17:27:04 No.3059728 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056992

You mean, faster write speed to disk? Your shutter speed determines the shooting speed. Get a 1066x card, write speed becomes a non-issue unless you're shooting 15+ shots in a burst

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 18:35:00 No.3059804 Report

Quoted By:

What are my snapshits worth? A regional car club wants to use my pictures in their bimonthly magazine. Is it worth trying to wrangle money out of them, or would it be better to get exclusive access or other intangibles instead?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 19 Apr 2017 23:45:17 No.3060087 Report

Quoted By: >>3060698

>>3059639
Oh yeah, gonna use the shit out of it even if everyone thinks terrible.

>>3059647
What effect will the crop factor have on pictures? Will it just mean that certain focal lengths will look different than on other camera bodies?

I'm not entirely certain how to describe lenses, but its 12-50mm and has options between manual zoom and electronic zoom as well as a macro option.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 18:33:51 No.3060628 Report

Quoted By: >>3060635

I only have one battery for my D610. Is it worth it to buy Nikon batteries, or are generic batteries ok? Its like 50$ for a nikon battery from my local store, or 20$ for STK battery from amazon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 18:47:55 No.3060635 Report

Quoted By: >>3060639

>>3060628
It's generally OK. You might have slightly less actual capacity than Nikon batteries, but you can usually pick up 2 off brand ones for the same price as 1 Nikon. Pick the well reviewed brand, Wasabi or Watson or similar, and it shouldn't melt your camera or anything.

I think you can get 2 wasabis with a double charger for $70 in the states. Jelly as fug leaf here.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 18:54:57 No.3060639 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060635
I'll get you a set and mail them to you, canadiabro

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 19:16:15 No.3060645 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057369
Just make sure it's matte and IPS.
Especially on a laptop because you won't be able to control reflections everywhere.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 19:23:10 No.3060649 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059502

You can change the way your DSLR makes JPEG's.
Make them as vivid as you like.
With Nikon it's called "picture control" not sure about other brands.

If you do want to shoot raw, then Lightroom is definitely the best program to start with.
Maybe add Photoshop later on if you want to do heavy editing.

Darktable is the best free alternative, but it's not as good and doesn't run on Windows only OSX and GNU+Linux.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 20:04:34 No.3060663 Report

Quoted By: >>3060667

What post processing software should I get? Also I dont plan on buying it

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 20:11:53 No.3060667 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060663
DCRaw + vim.
Just convert to text format and edit the pixel values.

Do it, freetard.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 21:24:58 No.3060698 Report

Quoted By: >>3061097

>>3060087
>What effect will the crop factor have on pictures?
Practically nothing, unless you are planning to adapt full frame lenses to use on your Olympus.

If I was you, I'd just stick to lenses made for m43. Olympus and Panasonic make some good ones, and some third-party lenses are out there, too, but they aren't as common as for other formats.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO images (14).jpg, 13KiB, 443x332

Anonymous Thu 20 Apr 2017 23:46:32 No.3060813 Report

Quoted By:

I bought an old canon zoom lens and it's not the cleanest. Is there a way to open up canon lenses to clean them?

How does stuff even get inside of them anyway?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO x-picture.jpg, 1MiB, 1545x1024

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 00:12:41 No.3060832 Report

Quoted By: >>3060835 >>3061503

the photo attached was taken about 30 years ago by my mom. it has been our family's "ghost" picture. i recently discovered it again as i hadn't seen it since i was around 10. i'm 33 now.

question: not saying it's of a ghost, would just like to know what could have created this image of the shadowy figure? it's not a double exposure cause i found the negative and there's no other person on either side of the negative. everything seems blurry, i'm thinking maybe somebody was moving when accidentally took picture. when picture was taken, my mom swears nobody else was in the room with her.

any ideas? thanks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 00:16:00 No.3060835 Report

Quoted By: >>3060866

>>3060832
Spooky but cool as hell, those wispy bits are the best part.

I got no idea though

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Resized.jpg, 377KiB, 1000x652

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 00:55:47 No.3060861 Report

Quoted By: >>3060957

>>3056078
How do I best avoid noise when taking a photo of landscapes? I've worked on some photos in LR to try and mitigate the noise but I'm not really satisfied. This picture in particular seems to maintain it's noise no matter what I try.

>This was taken literally my first ever trip out with a camera just starting out so please be as judgmental as possible as I'm all about improving

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 01:03:12 No.3060866 Report

Quoted By: >>3060881

>>3060835
thanks. yeah, i'm no photographer and have no idea what would have created that figure-like thing. it's been a family mystery.

i would really like to get to the bottom of it. i'm at the point where i would like the negative analyzed forensically to get some answer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 01:41:03 No.3060881 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060866
Its probably a ghost. Go back to that room and take some pics
"they say she still sits in front of that window to this day... 30 years later..."

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 01:50:57 No.3060886 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057011
Related question should I paint the gold ring around some of my cheap lenses for shits and giggles, and if yes, what paint to use

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 02:43:59 No.3060925 Report

Quoted By: >>3060929

so bought a second hand canon eos 1200d.
came with cds n' stuff
laptop has no cd's

how do i update the software on the camera? can't find a download for the eos utility thing, only updates. :/

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 03:02:27 No.3060929 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060925
sorted. all g.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20170401_071435.jpg, 2MiB, 2448x2448

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 03:20:02 No.3060940 Report

Quoted By: >>3060951 >>3062226 >>3066769 >>3066930

How to get gud

I'm a super shitty beginner and my gf wants me to be better at taking photos, mostly of her

Here's a pic I took from my cp, how is it for a beginner?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 03:49:01 No.3060951 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060940
Do it for yourself. No matter what anyone says being "good" is entirely subjective if you like your picture.
Taking pictures of a significant other is very nice though and really all you have to do is probably make her look cute, dreamy, sexy, whatever and she will like it.
as for that pic.. its fine i guess if the exposure and lighting were better it would be fine too.. go out with an idea and take pics, it will help a lot more than just a random snap that meant nothing

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 03:59:38 No.3060957 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060861
Play around with the settings, if you have a steady hand or tripod you could do bracketing.
or you could overexpose the sky a bit to get shadow details then bring the sky back in Lightroom with an adjustment brush dialing exposure down for that adjustment.

depends on the camera, mine seems to be better at recoverying shadows than highlights for example so I try not to overexpose too much.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 11:10:58 No.3061066 Report

Quoted By: >>3061114

I always see people talking about DR when discussing cameras and having the ability to push 3-4 stops this and that. But who actually has to push their picture by 4 stops of light? Or is there something else a 4 stop DR sensor does better than a 2 stop DR sensor?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO X-700-brocure.jpg, 72KiB, 600x843

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 11:21:36 No.3061067 Report

Quoted By: >>3061068 >>3070473

I posted in /fgt/, but the thread died and the ony response was a super salty brandfaggotry shitposter.

So I have a bunch of MD lenses (fuck you, phillip reeve, for getting me hooked on manual lenses) and want an MD body.

Thinking an X-700 or X-500. How much should I spend? Is the motor drive worth it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 11:25:52 No.3061068 Report

Quoted By: >>3061102

>>3061067
I'd get a non-electronic Minolta desu, I had too many just die on me before. Currently using a SRT-101. It's fully manual but it has a built in light meter that's pretty reliable

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 12:53:33 No.3061097 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060698
Thank you <3

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 13:05:28 No.3061102 Report

Quoted By: >>3061207

>>3061068

Whats shooting on the SRT-101 like?

I tried an X-500 before, and the thing I liked about it, was it showed both my selected shutterspeed and the metered shutterspeed in the viewfinder.

It would also warn me if my selected shutterspeed was too low for handheld shots.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 13:23:31 No.3061114 Report

Quoted By: >>3061170

>>3061066
It's not the whole photo being pushed 4 stops, it's shadow detail being brought up 4 stops or whatever. It's the ability to shoot higher DR scenes with ETTR and push the dark areas until they're nice and visible. Yes, in most cases, you might only need 2 stops, but as with most things, more is better or at least nice to have.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 15:50:18 No.3061170 Report

Quoted By:

>>3061114
Exactly.

For me the high DR is mainly about preventing the skies from blowing out.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 16:24:29 No.3061207 Report

Quoted By:

>>3061102
yes the shutter speeds show in the viewfinder.

The camera does not warn you about the shutter speed for handheld shots, but that's not something that the camera can determine for you anyways desu.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 21 Apr 2017 20:06:50 No.3061354 Report

Quoted By: >>3061505

The camera on my phone sucks so I want to get a nice digital camera, would a first gen Ricoh be a good choice? I love how the b&w looks but how is color photography and low light? There's a first gen for 110 dollars on Craigslist in mint condition, is it worth picking up or should I talked the seller down? Thanks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 00:40:11 No.3061503 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060832
double exposure

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 00:42:16 No.3061505 Report

Quoted By: >>3061516

>>3061354
buy a Sony a6300

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 01:02:51 No.3061516 Report

Quoted By:

>>3061505
It's pretty pricey, how much better is it than the a6000 or Ricoh gr?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMGP0605.png, 812KiB, 1000x662

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 05:49:16 No.3061653 Report

Quoted By: >>3061666 >>3062171

I suck and I'm getting worse. I fucking love photography, and I know a lot about it, but I just fucking suck. All day I get inspired to photograph stuff and then when I do bring my camera with me I take nothing but shit. I've lived in the most ridiculously photogenic places and whenever I make all the effort to go out and capture them it's a gigantic waste of time.

I don't know what to do, I need someone who wants to go out togging with me I think. I just keep getting discouraged and don't take my camera out anymore. Help /p/

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 22 Apr 2017 06:10:25 No.3061666 Report

Quoted By:

>>3061653
iktfb

>I fucking love photography
this is all that really matters

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 02:16:38 No.3062171 Report

Quoted By: >>3062210

>>3061653
Quit and sell your gear to someone who isn't a whiny loser

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 03:24:35 No.3062201 Report

Quoted By: >>3062206

>>3056078
is it there are no speedbooster for nikon body to nikon lenses?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 03:28:11 No.3062206 Report

Quoted By: >>3062228

>>3062201

Because speedboosters don't work like that.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1366158616455_cam.png, 56KiB, 329x455

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 03:32:25 No.3062210 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062171

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 03:46:56 No.3062226 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060940
Is that Philippines? mah nigga

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 03:48:06 No.3062228 Report

Quoted By: >>3062246

>>3062206
so if I really want a speedboster, then i must use a lens that is larger than the sensor?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 04:06:46 No.3062239 Report

Quoted By:

What are some good sites for LR presets that ain't all about imitating VSCO? I don't want to use presets other than my own, but often time I found myself curious about how people come with those effects.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 04:25:04 No.3062246 Report

Quoted By: >>3062254

>>3062228

No, speedbosters require space.

You must use a camera with a mount that has a flange distance shorter than the mount of the lens you intend to use.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 04:44:49 No.3062254 Report

Quoted By: >>3062283

>>3062246
ahh ok, so in theory, if I have a lens that has a longer flange distance than the nikon ones then it will work? checking from wikipedia, maybe a lens for pentax645 would work? (excluding the problem of adapting mount)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flange_focal_distance

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 05:29:38 No.3062268 Report

Quoted By: >>3062427

>>3056078
is it a good idea to shoot at 60fps so I can lower it down to 24 or 30 if I ever want to in the future?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 06:01:31 No.3062283 Report

Quoted By: >>3062320

>>3062254

Yes.

But you lose autofocus. And many cameras lack proper manual focus assists, which means it will be a bitch and a half to use.

Honestly, it isn't worth the trouble on DSLRs, mirrorless is a different story.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 07:57:19 No.3062320 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062283
It was just a thought. It is a pain in the ass to focus manually with that small viewfinder. I had a few minolta lenses from the film camera and tried to use them on my nikon with a cheap adapter. At best, maybe two thirds of the shots are in focus.
At least I got a better understanding now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 13:44:19 No.3062427 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062268
>60fps played at 24fps
iirc It will look like slow-motion, but I think there is a fix for that in editing software

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO received_1515210065179878.png, 1MiB, 1213x792

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 14:34:09 No.3062452 Report

Quoted By: >>3062478 >>3062507

What is this violet shit and how do i get rid of it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:08:34 No.3062473 Report

Quoted By: >>3062484

Found some old 35mm cameras from my parents and started shooting up some film the past couple of weeks, but i'm not sure where to develop the film. My local CVS charges about $14 per 24 exposures. Walmart is a bit cheaper but they charge a development fee (woman on the phone didn't know how much the fee was).
I'm wondering if it'd be worth it to just ship the rolls to a lab instead of trying somewhere local. I'm from Houston Tx if that helps.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:15:46 No.3062478 Report

Quoted By: >>3062492

>>3062452
You have a bad case of the dreaded purple fringing (PF). To avoid it, stop down when shooting or get a better lens. You can generally remove it in post (software like Lightroom has specific tools for this purpose), but the results aren't always perfect.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:18:19 No.3062484 Report

Quoted By: >>3062489

>>3062473
You should google film developing in your area first. There seems to be a few from what im seeing.

To my knowledge Walgreens and CVS dont give back negatives for whatever reason so youll never be able to make copies. 14 dollars is around what i pay (11)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:23:48 No.3062489 Report

Quoted By: >>3062506

>>3062484
$14 just seems pricey, especially since I already have 4-5 rolls that i'll be trying to develop within the next month

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:26:34 No.3062492 Report

Quoted By: >>3062494 >>3062504

>>3062478
Thats wierd because I just got this new canon 1.8f 50mm lense a week ago, though my body is like 8 yrs old( canon 500d)

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:29:31 No.3062494 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062492
Did you ever look up the amount of chromatic aberration the lens has?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:45:01 No.3062504 Report

Quoted By: >>3062645

>>3062492
Well, you should also be aware that while higher quality lenses are usually better at correcting chromatic aberration, some amount of purple fringing is unavoidable if you're shooting at large apertures against bright sky. I think only mirror lenses are supposed to be completely free of the problem.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:47:37 No.3062506 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062489
Film isnt cheap unless you do it yourself.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO JwnXjdY.jpg, 917KiB, 1814x2268

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:49:53 No.3062507 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062452
Go to bed Andrius

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 15:50:34 No.3062508 Report

Quoted By:

What is the status of the /p/ book for 2016?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 23 Apr 2017 19:42:56 No.3062645 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062504
Thanks man

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 17:45:39 No.3063197 Report

Quoted By:

>>3057150
those are literally all shit

get a Lenovo 700/Y700 or an XPS 13 if you can spend a little more

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 19:31:23 No.3063235 Report

Quoted By: >>3063236

I noticed that I spend a lot of time editing colors in Lightroom trying to make average pictures 'better' when I should be focusing on taking better pictures

Should I set my camera to jpeg black and white for a few months and see if I take better pictures? I only shoot raw right now but I feel like I overthink post

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 19:41:52 No.3063236 Report

Quoted By:

>>3063235
I was thinking about that too. But I thing it depends if the color you want is achievable without having to go into post. If the picture is good and you just need to adjust some lighting and tones then I dont think that means your pictures are bad...

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 21:15:17 No.3063284 Report

Quoted By:

soooo. DPI, whats the deal?

if i export a picture with lightroom at the highest resolution i can get, but set the dpi to 72, then open it in photoshop, save it as 300dpi and print it, then that image will be exactly the same as if i export it in lightroom with 300dpi, right?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 27 Apr 2017 17:42:03 No.3064976 Report

Quoted By:

Does it make sense to buy a 5D Mark II today, knowing that all the cheap ones are used and abused?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Apr 2017 05:12:28 No.3065339 Report

Quoted By:

I really want to get into that sweet, sweet art grant whoring game - however it turns out the definition of a "Professional" is not inline with "Freelancer" and that someone needs to come to me with more than just some portraiture work.

My question is this, how do I get work outside of basic freelancing?

Should I send my portfolio to local galleries, should I just keep grinding until eventually someone throws me a bone?
Should I just embellish my art grant applications until eventually I get a judge who doesn't care that much?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Apr 2017 14:04:30 No.3065590 Report

Quoted By: >>3065664 >>3068265

Are there any decent DSLR cameras I could get for less than $550 USD?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Apr 2017 16:40:18 No.3065663 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056078
I shoot with a dslr, but what factors should I consider when I'm thinking of printing one for personal keeping, for say future portfolio images and such?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Danny 1.jpg, 724KiB, 4928x3264

Anonymous Fri 28 Apr 2017 16:42:43 No.3065664 Report

Quoted By: >>3066094

>>3065590
I use a Pantex K50, not the best for filming but here's a sample of quality, even though I'm pretty shit bruh

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 28 Apr 2017 18:02:16 No.3065690 Report

Quoted By:

Recently went through some old old boxes from my parents and found two old manual film cameras. First is a Vivitar 220 / SL, and the other is a Minolta SRT-200. Both seem to be working as far as mechanics, but I plan on buying a couple rolls of film and going out to test them. If they both end up work I'd like to get into film photography over the summer.
The vivitar has a 50mm 1:1.8 vivitar lens, and the minolta has a minolta md 50mm 1:2 lens.
Question #1 are these lenses okay for starting out, or should I try to look into finding some other cheap lenses that would be better?
Question #2 If I develop my own film, and take it to get scanned and printed, would it just be the same cost wise as sending it to get developed too? Thanks in advance

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 984418c0711a4c52ffa1bd2ea4d1e4dd.jpg, 43KiB, 564x564

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 05:24:58 No.3066049 Report

Quoted By: >>3066093

Noob here.

Been using my old as fuck 700d for amateur stuff to some success, but i'd like a camera that can focus worth a damn.

Heard the new 80 is a dream, but is there any other i should consider?

Also, what is the best focusing type to use?

Been zoom/manual alright, but i miss great action shots.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 07:36:50 No.3066093 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066049
a9

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO K50_1855WR_AW.jpg, 446KiB, 1600x1066

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 07:41:01 No.3066094 Report

Quoted By:

>>3065664
i also use this camera and i think it's the bees tits. also, weather sealing.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 08:54:04 No.3066108 Report

Quoted By: >>3066130 >>3066194

Climate March tomorrow. Should I go and take photos? As a conservative I find the notion of being surrounded by a bunch of hippy liberals to be utterly disgusting. I mean, I dunno, would you bother showing up to take photos at a rally for something you don't personally support.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 09:52:54 No.3066130 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066108

Probably a bunch of funny signs.

And some super weirdo hippies.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 10:23:23 No.3066139 Report

Quoted By: >>3066217

I have a D3300.

I want to buy a 50mm prime lens so I can practice my portrait skills. Going to be shooting [spoiler:lit]my sister[/spoiler:lit] Can someone tell me the difference between these two?

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/247091-USA/Nikon_2137_Normal_AF_Nikkor_50mm.html/prm/alsVwDtl

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/766516-USA/Nikon_2199_AF_S_Nikkor_50mm_f_1_8G.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 12:23:55 No.3066194 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066108
>man-made global warming isn't real
you're a fucking moron

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 13:44:18 No.3066217 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066139
The first one has no built-in autofocus motor. So it won't autofocus on your d3300 and you'll have to manual focus. Other than that the aperture blades in the af-s are rounded and make for slightly better bokeh

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1020236 TWO.jpg, 717KiB, 1000x752

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 15:48:33 No.3066242 Report

Quoted By:

I have a Lumix G7 I usually use for Videos but from time to time I do party photography for friends and use an old flash for that, which I have to level manually.
I use the histogramm included in the camera for checkinf photos and I now noticed that even if the histogram displays no clipping or overblowing, the RAW files are still overblown. I use darktable on Linux for editing.
What's the reason for this?
The histogram is divided into 4 parts and generally, if the most upper level is in the last quarter, it is well blown out beyond any saving grace in the RAW
The attached image is adjusted for exposure to show how much the highlights are blown out

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 17:35:54 No.3066280 Report

Quoted By:

>>3059288
she looks pretty ayyy no matter what the focal length is

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 17:44:42 No.3066282 Report

Quoted By: >>3066332

what's the proper way to use a flash, and when exactly to use it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 29 Apr 2017 21:17:17 No.3066332 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066282
You use a flash to add light. How and when depends on what you're shooting. Go through strobist and see if that gives you some boilerplate understanding.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 00I0I_ju24CSNPawl_600x450.jpg, 26KiB, 600x450

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 01:17:21 No.3066449 Report

Quoted By: >>3066461

What camera is this? someones selling on it on craigslist for 50 and I'm seeing if its worth it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO b6374a66b64cebb65e5db612bbe0a088.png, 724KiB, 649x580

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 01:45:01 No.3066461 Report

Quoted By: >>3066522

>>3066449
Is this a good deal, I searched up the lens, and from what I can tell the lens itself is worth 100-300

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 02:57:40 No.3066486 Report

Quoted By: >>3066520

If I am going to take a long exposure shot using the timer/bulb function (my camera only goes up to 30s) how should i compensate with my f stop?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 03:51:40 No.3066513 Report

Quoted By: >>3066637

Is quality lost when converting your film negatives into digital files?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 04:05:22 No.3066520 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066486
Day or night? If it's going to be bright you'll need a neutral density filter for sure. If it's night you'll have to speriment a little. Depends on the shot and how bright the lights are gonna be.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 04:07:35 No.3066522 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066461

not a good deal

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 09:25:30 No.3066637 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066513
yes obviously

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 15:42:15 No.3066760 Report

Quoted By: >>3066772

Can anyone help me? when using my a6k and a Samyang lens on raw my pictures turns out to be muddy/grainy.

even with proper lighting it end up like shit. I know I have a fault since everything seems decent on auto.

is ISO 100-400 too low indoor with lights? is there any cheat sheet for ISO?

whats the best formula to determine what shutter speed to use?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 16:16:10 No.3066769 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060940
learn about composition techniques, "proper" lighting and post processing with your phone. Practice and take photos erryday desu.

Is that EDSA?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 16:20:44 No.3066772 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066760
Fuck manual mode and go to one of the priority modes
>Shutter priority for when you care more about freezing/blurring motion
>aperture priority for when you care more about depth of field
Use auto ISO with an upper limit set at like 6400

There's very little reason to use manual these days outside of when you are shooting in a studio and using strobes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 16:55:12 No.3066786 Report

Quoted By: >>3066791

hobby photographer doing senior pictures for a couple of friends. i plan on shooting with a d3300 with 35mm, 50mm and 70-300mm lenses.

tips???

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 16:59:04 No.3066791 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066786
Golden hour, make sure to get some backlit, as thin of DoF as you can.

Head over to pinterest for some posing ideas, shoot those to the friends first.

If possible and if it is friends, kinda make a day of it and have fun.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 18:31:06 No.3066866 Report

Quoted By: >>3066869 >>3066931

Traveling with a tripod for my camera.
Can I have it with my carry on?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 18:33:31 No.3066869 Report

Quoted By: >>3066870

>>3066866
Google says yes you can. I figured you could though.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 18:34:09 No.3066870 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066869
Thanks anon.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 19:31:26 No.3066930 Report

Quoted By:

>>3060940
shit you live in asia and your gf wants better pictures. the bar is high friend, start taking lots of shit with your phone and improve fast otherwise you gonna lose her to a guy who CAN take good pictures of her.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 30 Apr 2017 19:32:32 No.3066931 Report

Quoted By:

>>3066866
Yes you can. I carry tripods with me overseas and even in carry on as well.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 01 May 2017 01:51:13 No.3067130 Report

Quoted By:

Has anyone entered the contest for imaging-resource and won, even as a day winner?
http://www.dailydigitalphoto.com/cgi-bin/potd/potd_gallery.pl

They have some tips on what they are looking for but some of the winners don't really match what they say they want. If you look back on previous winners, you'll come across some that have poor quality. I've thought it could be from the website resizing images to display them, but I really can't see this being the case since the website owners can't be bad at using computers.
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/03/21/want-a-chance-to-win-a-300-gift-certificate-from-adorama-with-your-talents
http://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2015/09/20/how-to-not-win-our-photo-of-the-day-contest

Three people each month out of the month's winners will win gift certificates for a photography website. $300, $200, $100. Two runner-ups are also chosen with no reward. Daily winners receive nothing.
Would you agree with their decisions on who won during previous months?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 01 May 2017 03:38:38 No.3067190 Report

Quoted By: >>3067208

>>3056078
do you lose a large amount of quality when you use lens adapters?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 01 May 2017 04:02:10 No.3067208 Report

Quoted By:

>>3067190

If it has glass in it, you lose some.

Otherwise, no.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 01 May 2017 04:41:16 No.3067223 Report

Quoted By:

so, took some photos and the fog was too strong! as my Lr doesn't have the dehaze option, what is the best way to give my photo some colors and contrast, beside pushing contrast to +100 and a huge S curve in tone map?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO $_58.jpg, 21KiB, 640x422

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 00:41:44 No.3067740 Report

Quoted By: >>3067741 >>3067758

So this is an odd one, regarding hardware.

I'm putting a camera inside of a protective enclosure made of plexiglass and plywood and need a way to mount it to a basic bitch amazonbasics tripod. Basically, I need one of these except with a scew about 1/2" longer to be able to pass through the plywood and still thread into the camera.

What's the best way to go about this here? Drill out the short screw and replace it with a longer one? That's what I'm going with for now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 00:43:50 No.3067741 Report

Quoted By: >>3067758

>>3067740
The tripod screw is a standardised size so you should be able to buy one from a hardware store at the length you require.

Regarding removing the old screw, it should just 'screw' out if you turn it and pull it downwards and out of the tripod as you do so

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20170501_205659.jpg, 982KiB, 2560x1440

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 01:00:57 No.3067758 Report

Quoted By:

>>3067741
>>>3067740
>Regarding removing the old screw, it should just 'screw' out if you turn it and pull it downwards and out of the tripod as you do so
No dice, those sneaky podes stuck an e clip in there which keeps the threads from engaging. Is that standard? Idk. BUT, managed to get it out by sticking it in the press enough to bend out of the way. Got a longer screw ordered. Thanks for the help.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO fuck.jpg, 191KiB, 1000x667

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 03:57:21 No.3067880 Report

Quoted By:

What are the red squares around the spots and how do I get rid of them? They only show up when I export the image out of lightroom.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 15:10:44 No.3068116 Report

Quoted By: >>3068231 >>3068243

>>3056078
how do I distinguish "good" bokeh from "bad" bokeh? it all looks the same to me

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 18:49:13 No.3068231 Report

Quoted By:

>>3068116
>"creamy" bokeh
dumbfrog.jpg

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 19:02:51 No.3068243 Report

Quoted By:

>>3068116
not intrusive. a great shot with lots of bokeh is at the very most using the bokeh to accent the center of focus. if you're taking shots FOR the bokeh, why

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 19:37:59 No.3068265 Report

Quoted By: >>3069021

>>3065590
Look at used nikon d7100.
I upgraded from d3100. This is pretty good.

D7200 and d7500 have the same sensor with a few more addons (built-in wifi etc)

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 02 May 2017 23:20:02 No.3068410 Report

Quoted By:

I'm a concert photographer but I'm pretty broke and I want to take a swing at graduation photos but I'm only going to advertise to people I know (so fb/ig)
What would you guys charge for a full set of unwatermarked photos?
And whats a good amount of images to deliver as a final product?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 03 May 2017 06:04:43 No.3068604 Report

Quoted By:

Do camera's have a max sd card size?
I know that certain devices have a max compatible size, and I'm wondering if anyone knows for sure if they're are any max sizes for cameras.

I have a Panasonic Dmc zs50, is there a max size for this camera?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 03 May 2017 06:31:00 No.3068611 Report

Quoted By: >>3068937 >>3068998 >>3069881

>>3056078
are any of the freeware alternatives to Lightroom/Photoshop actually good? would rather not pirate and, if I read correctly, you lose your files if you go the subscription route with Adobe and end it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 03 May 2017 20:40:33 No.3068937 Report

Quoted By:

>>3068611
No

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 03 May 2017 23:26:53 No.3068998 Report

Quoted By: >>3069016

>>3068611
>you lose your files if you go the subscription route with Adobe and end it
...no you don't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 03 May 2017 23:49:57 No.3069016 Report

Quoted By: >>3069026

>>3068998
Yeah, they can be stored locally instead of the Cloud but I've read about some people not being able to view or edit them

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 04 May 2017 00:02:33 No.3069021 Report

Quoted By:

>>3068265
d7500 has d500 sensor

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 04 May 2017 00:09:07 No.3069026 Report

Quoted By:

>>3069016
What kind of retard only stores their images on a cloud of a subscription based service? Of course when you stop the subscription you lose access to the cloud storage. That's like expecting to be able to keep using closets in an apartment after you move out.

Only idiots can't access/edit their files because they're too stupid to figure out how to open dngs and psds in not-adobe programs. Solution there is don't only save in Adobe's proprietary format if you can figure out how to open them in another program.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 05 May 2017 02:20:33 No.3069881 Report

Quoted By:

>>3068611
GIMP, ya gimp

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 May 2017 00:18:11 No.3070400 Report

Quoted By: >>3070437

want to get into photography
got a Nikon d3100

is that a okay camera?
should i get a new lens instead of the kit one (18-55 something)?
should i just start taking pictures of everything, or focus on one thing (cars, houses etc)?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 May 2017 02:13:27 No.3070437 Report

Quoted By:

>>3070400
yes, it's ok for a beginner. a kit lens is fine unless you already know what type of photography you want to shoot, then you can decide what lens or camera system to buy next.

in the meantime, know your camera well, the controls, it's strength and limitations and how to properly use it.

better start learning about framing, composition and having a mindset of always analyzing a scene, practice alot just like any other form of hobby, sport or passion. and yup, start taking photos of people, scenery and objects so you'll know what you want to shoot. learning how to post process your photos properly is also a big plus if needed.

t. someone who still uses a Nikon D80 and an old chink camera phone

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 May 2017 03:15:47 No.3070473 Report

Quoted By: >>3070659 >>3073676

>>3061067
I have an XG-M, if you want it you can have it as long as you pay the shipping.
I got it for $4 and I have no MD lenses to put on it, but it works perfectly, no signs of wear

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 06 May 2017 09:58:24 No.3070659 Report

Quoted By:

>>3070473

Thanks, anon. But I picked up a slightly worn X-500 for dirt cheap.

Besides, I live in Japan. It would be like $50 to ship it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 170.jpg, 14KiB, 225x300

Anonymous Mon 08 May 2017 00:41:15 No.3071837 Report

Quoted By: >>3072563

I don't want to "get into photography" i'm just tired of my shitty phone camera not being able to take decent pictures of the awesome things i get to see. granted im not sure how much of the problem is actually the equipment but im thinking of getting a dedicated camera to take on my trips and to take some /diy/ hobby photos. maby somthing i'm less hesitant to take out of my bag than my phone because if i drop it and im 3 days from home i'm fucked,

i can get a used cannon sx170is for $100, is this worth it? would it be better than the camera on an iphone 6?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1e6542ea5edb428ad9f3e49d42aa3bea.jpg, 56KiB, 768x1024

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 00:55:10 No.3072554 Report

Quoted By: >>3072629

I am fail /p/. I got myself a speedlight and want to do similar to attached. I have no idea how to adjust the flash so that it's not filling the entire photo with light. It's a YN560 https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1101196-REG/yongnuo_yn_560iv_yn560_iv_speedlite.html

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 01:15:03 No.3072559 Report

Quoted By:

whats the patrician version of the E 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS that comes with a6300?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 01:25:32 No.3072563 Report

Quoted By:

>>3071837
If you don't want to get into photography, get a nicer phone with a better camera

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 03:25:10 No.3072620 Report

Quoted By: >>3072684

who is the godly racing photographer? Pretty old, shot film I just forget his name. People post his stuff sometimes, he shot a lot of grand prix stuff.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 03:42:16 No.3072627 Report

Quoted By:

If leaf shutters open centre out, how is the frame evenly exposed? If the centre is getting more light than the edges, why no harsh vignetting on slower shutter speeds?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 03:44:27 No.3072629 Report

Quoted By: >>3072645

>>3072554
Control your ambient exposure first. In this shot there's still some ambient light but it's dimmed. Then play with Flash power til you get the right amount of additional light on the subject

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 9fb281fdbc7386de9ae61ace4fc0800e.jpg, 243KiB, 900x605

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 04:21:57 No.3072645 Report

Quoted By: >>3072676

>>3072629
Thank you. I watched a few videos and they said to get it so that the photo is all black and then add the flash in. So I took a photo and the exposure was too low so it was all black and then added the flash in and the picture came out very nice for a product shot, but not for boudoir. I don't know how to change the flash power. I have a Pentax K3 and the YN560 speedlite.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 05:06:40 No.3072655 Report

Quoted By: >>3072679

>>3056078
what's everyone's ratio of keepers to garbage when they go shooting? I guestimate I'm at about 1:20

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 05:45:12 No.3072676 Report

Quoted By: >>3073202

>>3072645
Two things.
Check your camera's sync speed. You need to keep your shutter speed less than that, usually 1/125 or 1/250. If your shutter speed is above that, the flash won't be on for the whole shutter. You can figure it out by taking a photo with the flash at around 1/250". If there's a dark band at the bottom, your shutter speed needs to be lower, if there isn't a band you can maybe make it faster. Or just Google your cam's sync speed.

You can adjust the flash power by using the directional pad in manual mode. If the display reads 1/1, you're at full power, press the left button and it should go down to 1/2, one stop less light

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 05:49:17 No.3072679 Report

Quoted By:

>>3072655
On a bad day 2:1.

I'm Ken, your lord and saviour.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0361.jpg, 723KiB, 2000x1250

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 05:55:10 No.3072684 Report

Quoted By:

>>3072620
How hard is it too google "F1 photographer"?

It's Schlegelmich if you are still wondering.

http://www.schlegelmilch.com

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 20170505_094258e.jpg, 361KiB, 1000x665

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 07:42:08 No.3072725 Report

Quoted By: >>3072947

I did some bracketed shots during my last trip. I'm merging them in Efex Pro now and I need to be slapped on the hand before putting out a bunch of eye hurting turds.

This is my first time attempting HDR and with all the shittalking I've done on overcooked HDRs in the past, I'll admit I'm at a bit of a loss on how to take actual advantage of the expanded DR without making it look like overcooked shit or on the other hand like something that could have been easily pulled out of just a single RAW.

Pic related is my first tryout shot that I just cooked now. I have a feeling that there's something wrong with it and I'm sure I'll hate it tomorrow morning. Any suggestions on which dials to turn down or how to fix it, during merge or in post-merge post?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 08:19:27 No.3072738 Report

Quoted By: >>3072748

Anyone use a macro lense, just got one and it its lagging for a few seconds before taking the picture, and the af seems to be very finicky although not sure if thats because of shaky hands.

only used a normal zoom lense before this with manual focus.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _DSC5267-copy.jpg, 111KiB, 960x612

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 08:39:58 No.3072748 Report

Quoted By: >>3072760

>>3072738

Macro lenses can be quite slow to autofocus. Many of the have a switch for different 'modes' for af at different distances.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 09:19:03 No.3072760 Report

Quoted By: >>3072769

>>3072748
i got the tamron 90mm macro, the only switches it has is full and limit and ill be honest i don't know what those mean, the other lense i use has a manual and af switch but this one doesn't seem to, it has the 'm' and 'af' but on some type of ring i can't move.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 09:52:49 No.3072769 Report

Quoted By: >>3072784

>>3072760
full means it will focus all the way to close focus.
if you know you're not that close, select limit.
it will not go there and you'll get faster focus.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 10:22:14 No.3072784 Report

Quoted By: >>3072805

>>3072769
alright, thanks ill play around with it a bit more, the normal focus lense was much easier to use.

also is it normal that it takes a while to take the picture, im not using a mount and i usually lose original focus by the time the picture is taken.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 11:32:24 No.3072805 Report

Quoted By: >>3072817

>>3072784
if youre using a dslr, live view usually adds a pretty significant delay...

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 12:07:43 No.3072817 Report

Quoted By:

>>3072805
yeah im using a dslr but not live view, the lense the camera came with has no delay its just this macro so far which is having a delay.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 17:52:03 No.3072947 Report

Quoted By:

>>3072725
pls respond, I'm actually starting to think that it doesn't look bad after sleeping on it but I know I'm overcooking it somehow. After 20 years of being a photog I need guidance out of the HDR hole.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO wpid-86-touge.jpg, 195KiB, 666x490

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 17:54:22 No.3072951 Report

Quoted By:

Where do i find magazine tier photos, especially 90's ones?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 19:22:28 No.3072996 Report

Quoted By:

Hey yall, I'm looking to buy my first camera. My friend's selling their nikon d3100 with the standard 18-55mm lens. Is that still a good camera or should I save up and get a newer d3300?

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 19:54:21 No.3073004 Report

Quoted By:

>>3056078
Does anyone else get nauseous looking at photos taken with a fish-eye lens or am I the only one? Bonus points for a scientific explanation

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 20:33:35 No.3073025 Report

Quoted By: >>3073027

>>3056078

I'm a photojournalist that just got out of school, so I'm only just freelancing right now.

I've been asked to do some headshots for a friend-of-a-friend, and they're willing to pay me.

This person is also a student, and likely doesn't have much money.

What is a good starting price to charge them? I have no idea where to go with this.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 20:35:19 No.3073027 Report

Quoted By: >>3073075

>>3073025
Do it for sex.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 22:07:35 No.3073057 Report

Quoted By: >>3073065 >>3073119

>>3056078
What should I loom at when buying babbys first dslr? I've only ever into 35mm and I'm not sure what is too shitty for a cheap used dslr. How low should I be willing to go as far as mp goes? I saw a Canon super cheap but it was 8mp and another only like 50 bucks more that was 15mp. Any help is appreciated

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 22:24:55 No.3073065 Report

Quoted By: >>3073069

>>3073057
sony

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 22:35:33 No.3073069 Report

Quoted By: >>3073119

>>3073065
I'd rather go with a Canon eos of some kind since there cheap and I'll at least already have a 50mm lens

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 09 May 2017 22:58:15 No.3073075 Report

Quoted By:

>>3073027
Cool, but what about something more monetary? I much rather cash than sex.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 00:26:17 No.3073117 Report

Quoted By:

test

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO nigger.bmp.jpg.png, 53KiB, 621x614

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 00:29:59 No.3073119 Report

Quoted By: >>3073207

>>3073057
>>3073069
Here's your response anon, 4chan thinks I'm a bot and gives me Communication Error when trying to post it and I can't be fucked to figure out which word is it that triggers it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Shoes-Boudoir-Black-white.jpg, 346KiB, 800x1200

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 02:08:34 No.3073202 Report

Quoted By: >>3073770

>>3072676
The flash is attached to my camera at the moment as I didn't realize it needed the remote. I thought my camera and the flash would just connect wirelessly.

I have it in manual mode and took a photo with the +/- to where the photo would be black, completely under exposed as per a few tutorials I watched. I then mounted the flash to my camera and when I take a photo 1/60sec, 8f stop, the photo is like a normal photo with all bright and no darkness. I can't comprehend the YN560 instructions on how to turn down the flash amount.

What settings do I need to get similar to the photo attached? I thought the YN560 would be as intuitive to use as my K-3, but it's not. For the most part, I can get photos how I want just by changing a few settings on my Pentax, but now with the added flash I am completely lost. :(

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 02:16:05 No.3073207 Report

Quoted By: >>3073208 >>3073356

>>3073119
Pic related is what I was looking at getting, any Canon fags tell that can tell me how this camera is?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Screenshot_20170509-201438.png, 264KiB, 720x1280

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 02:17:10 No.3073208 Report

Quoted By: >>3073356 >>3073375

>>3073207
Of course I forgot it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 04:37:36 No.3073308 Report

Quoted By:

get an i series instead (the type with sensor cleaning) , 3ti and up...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 05:54:56 No.3073356 Report

Quoted By: >>3073579

>>3073207
>>3073208
Nikon guy again, Wikipedia compares it to the D90 which for many years has been an unbeatable workhorse and a backup body of many semi-pros shooting DX by choice (nature, sports, ...). But I don't know how 500D was regarded by the Canonfags.

At the same time it's a 2009 body so it may feel like a frustratingly slow and awkward clunker by today's tech standards. I wouldn't pay more than $250 for a D90 in a great condition today, even though I loved it to death back when it was still the hot shit (didn't own one but the office I worked at had a couple and we could rent them as we pleased, it was this that tipped me over to buying a DSLR of my own some time later).

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 06:37:20 No.3073375 Report

Quoted By: >>3073579

>>3073208
my eos m is better than this shit.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 18301325_10150888312414963_26362 (...).jpg, 106KiB, 750x750

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 11:51:08 No.3073476 Report

Quoted By: >>3073485

hey guys i thought i would post this picture here because i am a total amateur to photography and you seem to know everything about this whole thing so what i wanted to ask is about the pic i attached to this post.
can you make a digital photo look exactly like this? i know you can make it grainy,noisy and lower the resolution but i'm talking about the colors, the whole vibe of the picture that just makes it look like it's a 80s or 90s old picture.
i would be thankful if you sent me sites, tutorials or just general advice, thanks in advance

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 12:24:47 No.3073485 Report

Quoted By:

>>3073476
Photoshop curves and noise tools. Or use some plugins with film simulation. Or use Lightroom with plugins. Or some photo mobile apps with filters.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 13:11:41 No.3073506 Report

Quoted By: >>3073514

so it's totally possible to make digital photos look like this it just takes some time to master those tools you mentioned
thanks for you answer i'll try to get into them

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 13:28:19 No.3073514 Report

Quoted By:

>>3073506
Direct on-camera flash is the most important stylistic part of this picture. It looks a little underexposed, like the flash's reflection fooled the meter. It's also slightly out of focus.

Yeah the rest of the look you can achieve with levels and curves, add grain, crush blacks, maybe desaturate a little. Try VSCO if you have access to it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 16:04:58 No.3073579 Report

Quoted By:

>>3073356
>At the same time it's a 2009 body so it may feel like a frustratingly slow and awkward clunker by today's tech standards.
I've never even held a camera newer than my Canon from 2000 so just about anything is an improvement.
>>3073375
What should I get then for good value?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 17:32:49 No.3073625 Report

Quoted By: >>3073661

>>3056078
Just to be sure, can I mount my MC/MD lenses on Canon FD cameras? From what I've read they were around the same period and from when Minolta and Canon worked together.
Following along with the fact that Minolta also had a mounting system labeled "FD"
Any clarification would be helpful.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 18:31:29 No.3073661 Report

Quoted By:

>>3073625
Bump

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 18:59:52 No.3073676 Report

Quoted By:

>>3070473
>XG-M
My 101 recently bit it.
I'm interested...

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 10 May 2017 22:12:59 No.3073770 Report

Quoted By:

>>3073202
Anyone to help a newb out?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 43251341341.jpg, 46KiB, 360x640

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 00:51:09 No.3073857 Report

Quoted By:

what models are these?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 12:32:20 No.3074112 Report

Quoted By: >>3074125

So shooting jpg on Sony is pointless right? The colors are all jacked up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 12:53:44 No.3074125 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074112

Shooting jpeg on anything is pointless.

Besides, your raw will get autoconverted when you transfer with the play memories app. So if you need jpeg, thatd be the easiest way.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 12:58:39 No.3074130 Report

Quoted By: >>3074137

Why get a zoom lens when I can just zoom and crop in pp?

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 13:08:03 No.3074137 Report

Quoted By: >>3074139

>>3074130

Cause there is only so much you can zoom and crop before you have major image quality issues.

Unless you have like an a7rii or other high rez sensor, you wont be able to crop much at all really.

Real life isn't a TV show.

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 13:11:30 No.3074139 Report

Quoted By: >>3074151

>>3074137
So ka

Anonymous

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 13:35:07 No.3074151 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074139

so da

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1363152340977.jpg, 56KiB, 532x800

Anonymous Thu 11 May 2017 16:36:36 No.3074229 Report

Quoted By: >>3074894

I have tons of flash-related questions. I have a Rollei 35 and a Canon AE-1, and a speedlite 177A. How do I use this flash? Can I use it with both cameras? How does it know when to fire? What settings do I use with the flash? I've basically never used a flash before

>pic unrelated

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 16:54:16 No.3074857 Report

Quoted By:

This is a really dumb question but okay here goes

Why does video look worse than still pictures? On the same camera. Like is it possible to get picture still of a video?

If I'm shooting some moving scene or event or whatever is it better to take a video and see if I can find a good frame, or do burst shooting? Why does the picture look better?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 17:37:17 No.3074894 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074229
I have the exact same question lmao, got a AE-1 program and a 177 flash. Anyone know more about this????

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 20:42:24 No.3074964 Report

Quoted By: >>3074978 >>3075206 >>3076503

How do I get a better "eye" for photography? I think im ok for a beginner, but Ill go shooting, like a lot of my photos, but when I get home and look at them in detail, I hate all but a few, and wish I did something different. (angle, distance, aperture, etc)
Are there any good books or exercises I can check out to help get better?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 20:58:44 No.3074974 Report

Quoted By:

I didn't make a Flickr account yet.
Is there an option for private storage on that? I don't want to share, just store. And Google Photos has that 16 megapixel limit for unlimited storage.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 21:06:11 No.3074978 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074964
Look at lots of photos on tumblr or flickr, or go to a bookstore and look at photobooks and magazines, and figure out which ones you like. Try to reproduce techniques used by photographers you like. It sounds like you've already got an idea of what you like about what you're doing, so just keep shooting and refining that, too.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 0ad2fb15-c777-431c-9884-3f6b6d84 (...).jpg, 453KiB, 1280x853

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 21:12:36 No.3074983 Report

Quoted By: >>3074993 >>3074994

What settings get a shot like this?

I'm guessing the glow comes from a very wide aperture and fairly quick shutter?

Iso up a bit?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1.jpg, 1MiB, 2000x1194

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 21:17:28 No.3074990 Report

Quoted By: >>3075014

What do u think about this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 21:20:47 No.3074993 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074983
You have all data in exif, just read them

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 21:20:51 No.3074994 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074983
1/80 sec and f/2.0, according to the exif, which is about what I would have expected. The glow around the lights is flare. The auto white balance set the color temp to match the streetlights, so you see the red spill contrasting with that.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_2402.jpg, 15KiB, 163x240

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 22:18:35 No.3075014 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074990

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 12 May 2017 23:55:56 No.3075068 Report

Quoted By: >>3075081

Is post-processing cheating? I haven't done any processing to any of my pictures as I feel like it's cheating and I should just take better pictures instead of learn to process my pictures well. Maybe I just don't want to learn Lightroom.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 00:03:14 No.3075073 Report

Quoted By: >>3075208

New to /p/. How do I know which shutter speed to use depending on what it's like outside? What are the rules of thumb when it comes to sunny, overcast, night time, etc.?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 00:35:46 No.3075081 Report

Quoted By:

>>3075068
no. post process is an essential part of photography. if you don't do it (or direct it) yourself, you're letting someone else decide how the information you captured with the camera will be represented.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 06:57:25 No.3075206 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074964
>when I get home and look at them in detail, I hate all but a few
Absolutely natural to come back with 95% garbage, 4% all-right shots, and 1% or less of true keepers worth printing.

>Are there any good books or exercises I can check out to help get better?
Photobooks, photobooks, photobooks. Pick an artist or style you like, suck up your ego, then try to emulate their shots, composition and processing-wise. That's your exercise. Do it a lot. Do it enough and it will become second nature. Over time you'll notice you can start inserting your own style into it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO outdoor-exposure-sunny-161[1].jpg, 357KiB, 1000x935

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 07:01:39 No.3075208 Report

Quoted By:

>>3075073
You are only allowed to shoot in Manual until you memorize Sunny 16 and can apply it in all combinations of f-stop, shutter and ISO without thinking about it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO _DSC0233.jpg, 728KiB, 6016x2424

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 07:20:39 No.3075214 Report

Quoted By:

Why doesn't anything in this picture look sharp? I can't nail focus at all with my new d750, but I had zero trouble with my old k3. What gives? Do I just suck?

I have it set on single point AF.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 16:17:50 No.3075453 Report

Quoted By:

how to connect external microphone to an iphone 7 plus? I want to film with it

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 13 May 2017 19:24:23 No.3075512 Report

Quoted By:

Whats a good starter camera for less than $300?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Fujifilm-Fuji-Instax-Mini-8-Inst (...).jpg, 172KiB, 800x800

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2017 00:32:11 No.3075632 Report

Quoted By: >>3075969 >>3076102 >>3076534

So I just wanna ask this because I'm in no way shape or form a professional photographer.

So I wanted to buy my boyfriend one of these mini polaroids for his birthday. He treats it more like a hobby, he's not a real photographer, he just thinks its more trendy and cool. So point I'm trying to make, I don't need this to be super professional or anything.

I wanted to buy him the ones Ive seen on aliexpress, because I know he's treating this more as a toy (so I didn't want to invest in a super expensive one) Has anyone bought one from there? I shop there all the time for other things, but I wanted to see if anyone can vouch for the camera quality. Also the film as well? Basically just hoping to get someone's experience if they have one from shopping on there.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2017 14:24:03 No.3075969 Report

Quoted By:

>>3075632
They are alright cameras to play around with but it will never be a toy due to how expensive the film is. Also, you can probably get a genuine second hand polaroid for uber cheap that at least can be a collectible if he doesn't want to shoot it.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1411306814025.jpg, 613KiB, 1280x1832

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2017 18:02:42 No.3076093 Report

Quoted By: >>3076177

I like to think I know a bit about >muh geer
but one thing has been bothering me lately. Is a lens that is designed from the ground up for crop sensor (i.e. a 50mm dx nikon lens) actually the focal length it claims to be? I know that when using a full frame lens on a crop body it effectively changes the focal length so a 50 would be an 80, but if the lens is designed for crop sensors from the start wouldn't it make sense to just call it what it is?

tl;dr is a crop lens that is designed for crop sensors actually the advertised focal length

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2017 18:12:42 No.3076102 Report

Quoted By:

>>3075632
stop by a garage sale or ebay and pick up a polaroid for like $5-10. SX-70's are fun to use as well as look at, although the film is a little bit rare/expensive now. Folding bellows cameras are a little easier to find film for, and have that neat vintage look to them. Plus, you'll be breathing new life into old cameras. I've got a Polaroid 420 that I picked up for $7, and a few packs of the film that cost me like $20 each.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 14 May 2017 21:22:35 No.3076177 Report

Quoted By:

>>3076093

A 50mm lens is a 50mm lens, being used on or designed for a crop sensor does not change that.

The crop sensor ONLY changes the effective field of view of that lens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 May 2017 01:36:05 No.3076274 Report

Quoted By:

Why the fuck is there so much noise in my RAW images? I shoot at ISO 800, should I drop down to 400?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 May 2017 06:37:36 No.3076404 Report

Quoted By: >>3076406

How the hell do I compress my 70 mb RAW files to 1 MB (approximately) JPGs without it being incredibly lossy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 May 2017 06:46:29 No.3076406 Report

Quoted By:

>>3076404

You don't.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 May 2017 12:56:50 No.3076503 Report

Quoted By:

>>3074964
check the photos you like from other photogs, study the photog's style, study the photos for around 10 minutes each, deconstruct them, know why they look good, why you are drawn to the photos, then imitate what you have observed and incorporate it to your desired style. also, learn how to post-process tastefully. also practice alot for consistency. treat it like any sport, serious hobby or work.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 May 2017 14:14:09 No.3076534 Report

Quoted By:

>>3075632
Or just shoot with a mobile phone, and buy a portable printer (size of a mobile phone), install the mobile app with filters, including Polaroid effect. If you're interested, there's a youtube review of diff. portable printers, stated that the Kodak printer produced the photos where the ink doesn't bleed when splashed with water. Portable printers might be the future trend, I'm guessing leaning more to the female demographic who like taking snapshots. At least you can borrow it from your bf too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 15 May 2017 23:23:12 No.3076791 Report

Quoted By:

hey, /p/tards! what is a good dedicated flash unit for the sony a6000?

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches

QTDDTOT