>>3058998>14mmWell full frame goes down to 10mm on commonly available lenses, 14 to 10 is about the same level of difference going 50mm to 35mm!
>f2.8 is a fast lensNot really, when on full frame you can go 3 to 4 stops faster.
>no lens can outresolve any sensorEXACTLY, so minimise this issue by going for the most forgiving sensor, not the most demanding. By knowing your lens limits your resolution, not your mp count, you should definitely not recommend a sensor that needs a 400% sharper lens to compete in this one metric.
>>3059002>photography is about feels, not gearYep, and clients nearly all 'feel' like super shallow dof works best for them. The nice thing about full frame is it can do everything, whereas m43 is stuck with meme dof and an inability to crop at all without the lens softness being an issue.
>you are ignoredClearly, that's why most of the board uses m43, right? Nah, let's be real, the only regulars on the board that don't shoot full frame are fujicucks and third world brazilitards. And you're doing a good job of ignoring me by admitting to being tilted
>>3059004>best photos are taken with bad gearNo, ask gursky, schoeller, crewdson, ansel what gear they used.
>only one person cares about sensor size and it's implicationsThen why are we all shooting ff or larger? Why do you foster so much dissonance that you reason anyone that disagrees with you is all one poster? Is it because you're upset you're poor?
Oh, and great rebuttal to objective facts within photography, I never considered that the emotional connection to my vtech webcam makes it produce better photos than my d810 and completely negates any image quality issues.
Why are poor people always so dumb?
