/p/ - Photography » Thread #3062827

[48 / 7 / ?]

202KiB, 1000x667, IMG_0214.jpg

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:18:12 No.3062827 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3062829 >>3062838 >>3062841 >>3062884 >>3062905 >>3062908 >>3062925 >>3062984 >>3062998 >>3063084 >>3063116 >>3063531

Is the Fujifilm x100F worth the money? Thinking between a sigma Quattro or a x100f.

The x100 is pretty up there in price so I figure why not just spend more for the 24mp sensor upgrade, or maybe get a foveon system.

Bayer sensor cucks need not apply, see pic related for why.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:21:09 No.3062829 Report

Quoted By: >>3062831 >>3062832

>>3062827
Probably one of the worst images that has been posted to this board, which is saying something because isi posts here too

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:23:58 No.3062831 Report

Quoted By: >>3062836

>>3062829
>projecting anon
$1000 says isi is better than you

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0213.jpg, 277KiB, 1000x750

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:24:20 No.3062832 Report

Quoted By: >>3062838 >>3062905 >>3063531

>>3062829

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO faggot isis anon.jpg, 84KiB, 1049x474

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:30:03 No.3062836 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062831

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:35:18 No.3062837 Report

Quoted By:

Is it this picture related to sony fanboy ?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:41:22 No.3062838 Report

Quoted By: >>3062840

>>3062827
>>3062832

Why does he have two watermarks in the photo?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:43:23 No.3062840 Report

Quoted By: >>3063104

>>3062838
so you cant just crop off that side

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:44:29 No.3062841 Report

Quoted By: >>3062845 >>3062875

>>3062827
>Welcome to the official site of Jason Lanier Photography. Jason Lanier is an award winning wedding, portrait, landscape, wildlife, and photojournalism photographer. Jason is an accomplished speaker and presenter in the photography industry as well as a Sony Artisan of Imagery and Rotolight Master of Light who also teaches photographers how to pursue their dreams and master their photography. Jason is available for photography assignment, speaking engagement, or photography training session anywhere in the world.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 02:57:03 No.3062845 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062841
I will never forget the time I responded to a comment on one of Jason's YT vids about the fact that he looked too dark (not well it enough), and he thought I was commenting on his weight or something.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0215.jpg, 364KiB, 1000x750

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 03:02:46 No.3062849 Report

Quoted By: >>3062864 >>3062905 >>3062908 >>3062942 >>3062984 >>3063107 >>3063531

How do I get bad like this at photography? I'm not good but I really want to suck and fail miserably like Jason does.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 03:27:04 No.3062864 Report

Quoted By: >>3062872

>>3062849

>highlights -100
>whites -100
>blacks +100
>shadows +100
>clarity +100
>taste -100

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG_0143.jpg, 116KiB, 1149x832

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 03:36:20 No.3062872 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062864
>taste -100

That gave me a good chuckle. Thanks for the laughs anon it has been a long day.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 03:43:52 No.3062875 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062841
>'photojournalism photographer'

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 03:50:20 No.3062884 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062827
Congratulations OP on making the classic mistake of using a more interesting (or, in this case, aggravating) picture than your thread itself.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:13:56 No.3062901 Report

Quoted By: >>3062903 >>3063100

>manlet
>fat
>bald
>fedora
>as unlikable as angryphotographer but lacks the loveable lunatic dimension to make somewhat up for it

How the fuck does he do it? How does he land those 60k payout trustfund weddings? How does he run a successful youtube channel

I'm thinking there's something about his bluntness and unlikable personality that combine to make him seem very open and trustworthy? Am I completely crazy?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:19:52 No.3062903 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062901
I've manager to piss him off on most of his videos

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:22:41 No.3062905 Report

Quoted By: >>3062912

>>3062832
>>3062827
>>3062849
what bothers me the most is that these photos could actually be sort of cool, the ideas are there and they are nice, but that post processing is worse that absolutely anything

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:26:15 No.3062908 Report

Quoted By: >>3062966

>>3062827
>>3062849
holy fuck that's disgusting
I feel like a true pro now

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:30:07 No.3062912 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062905
>these photos could actually be sort of cool, the ideas are there and they are nice

What the fuck.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:40:28 No.3062925 Report

Quoted By: >>3062966

>>3062827
dumbest composition ever.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO DSC00827.jpg, 1MiB, 1500x1000

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 04:56:41 No.3062942 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062849
be Mormon
you will fail up if you accept jesus christ as your personal lord and savior

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 05:30:59 No.3062966 Report

Quoted By: >>3063030

>>3062925
>>3062908
Jason got a lot better after he switched to Sony. No lies.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqqvqHry2XU

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 06:01:38 No.3062984 Report

Quoted By: >>3062993

>>3062827
>implying xtrans is any different to bayer

Lol, no, it's the same sony sensor, but instead of evenly distributing the color filter in the most efficient way, fuji decided to clump together the green bits.

The end result for the consumer is no better color, and photos that can't be edited in any of the 3 popular software packages without weird wormy artifacts.

Also, fuji has discontinued some of the x100 range as of today, and they have nothing on their roadmap except in medium format, which they stuck to bayer filter.

Foveon is fantastic if you can afford it, and have a second bayer body for going over iso 400.

>>3062849
>fail miserably like jason does

Failed his way to millionaire, where do I sign up?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 06:04:08 No.3062987 Report

Quoted By: >>3063027

Is it just me, or is Jason Lanier a bit of a creep -- like in some of the tutorial videos he posts, he is clearly hitting on the models - and he's got that f***ing fedora thing going on.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 06:11:33 No.3062993 Report

Quoted By: >>3063000

>>3062984
>Also, fuji has discontinued some of the x100 range as of today
Because a new one just came out you dumb bristolian

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 06:20:34 No.3062998 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062827
This photo is so bad lmao

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 06:25:05 No.3063000 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062993
What's a bristolian? Is that a britbong word?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 07:41:15 No.3063027 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062987
he's a neckbeard without the beard and with money

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 07:46:08 No.3063030 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062966
>being a Sony shill
>unironically rating Lanier

wew lad

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 09:37:16 No.3063084 Report

Quoted By: >>3063405

>>3062827
X100
>literally some of the worst optics ever made in recent years
>shit autofocus
>terrible x-trans sensor

I mean, if you want a shitty camera, go ahead.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 10:36:38 No.3063099 Report

Quoted By:

goddamn can we just have a jason lanier hate thread, i don't know why sony pay this cunt
his photos look like someone has eaten a ton of skittles and just vomited

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 10:40:01 No.3063100 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062901
One of Jason's nightime urban exploration with the A7S got 1,1 million views.

If the Angry fatographer actually bothered to venture outside his mom's basement, maybe something interesting would happen for him too.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 1493000292274.jpg, 179KiB, 809x542

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 10:58:48 No.3063104 Report

Quoted By: >>3063108 >>3063531

>>3062840
It isn't hard to crop out those stupid watermarks, if I cared enough I could also photoshop them out.

Two watermarks on a photo implies he's just some faggot that thinks so highly of himself he'd put distracting watermarks on two corners of an image. Who the hell would want to steal this garbage, it's something I used to do when I just started, smudged the entire fucking picture with a maxed out clarity/contrast brush. It's disgusting and it somewhat triggers me

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:08:17 No.3063107 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062849
>Start a youtube channel, talk about how good you are for 5 years and say everyone else's opinion is shit.
>Become a Sony shill with your platform
>Brandish your picture with two watermarks because your trademark is more valuable than the crap you produce.
>Duplicate the HDR look so the normies would be impressed by something that doesn't fit reality.
>Max out the clarity to 100 and have an adjustment brush fill in more clarity on top of that
>omg /the/ Jason Lanier shot me

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:08:52 No.3063108 Report

Quoted By: >>3063109

>>3063104
>who the hell would want to steal this garbage

>posted incessantly on 4chan, his name is now common knowledge around here and has probably fed traffic to his website and youtube page.

Yeh, you sure showed him about the value of watermarks.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:15:11 No.3063109 Report

Quoted By: >>3063110 >>3063111

>>3063108
That you Jason?

I never seen anyone praise his work on 4chan, it's more common the opposite happens.
It's not jealousy, there are plenty of photographers with far more notoriety than him that never get bashed as often.

His editing makes everyone look like they're Jersey Shore and the clarity just helps shows all those wonderful imperfections in someone's face. Why are they so orange?

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:21:55 No.3063110 Report

Quoted By:

>>3063109
No one mentioned jealousy, stop projecting.

And thanks for driving traffic and raising awareness of my photos, it's what really matters, let's face it, none of you can afford me to shoot for you, this is the best you could do. I never claimed the people that pay my bills have taste, just big fuckin' wads of cash.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:23:54 No.3063111 Report

Quoted By: >>3063117

>>3063109
>It's not jealousy
I'm pretty sure it is. Especially the angry fatographer is mad at him for betraying Nikon, and he posts here often shilling for himself so it makes sense he would add to the shitposting.

They also had a series of video reply arguments.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:47:51 No.3063116 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062827
>Is the Fujifilm x100F worth the money?

Depending on your needs, yes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:49:11 No.3063117 Report

Quoted By:

>>3063111
Couldn't give less of a shit about a camera's brand, just the personality that's behind it.

I stopped watching his videos a while back, used to like him, now it's just indifference.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 24 Apr 2017 11:51:20 No.3063118 Report

Quoted By:

What it comes down to is do you have other cameras / lenses and how much you personally feel you can do with a 35mm lens.

Now personally as someone with a 5D IV + a lot of big heavy lenses. I feel the x100F (way back from when I had the 5D mark iii and the og x100) is all I need as a travel / my life camera.

Sometimes for landscapes you may want to go a little wider, I'm happy to make pano's in that case and maybe invest in the 50mm for when you want to do tight portraits other than that it can cover all my needs.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Apr 2017 00:03:57 No.3063405 Report

Quoted By: >>3063408 >>3063450

>>3063084
Apart from being soft at wide open and min focus, what's bad about it

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Apr 2017 00:09:05 No.3063408 Report

Quoted By:

>>3063405
Nothing, he just has no discovered stopping down yet or why people like soft wide open optics for portraits

I don't want it sharper at f2 lol

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Apr 2017 02:04:22 No.3063450 Report

Quoted By: >>3063456 >>3064308

>>3063405

Dunno about the F, but the original never got sharp. Ever.

Worse than the 18mm somehow.

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Apr 2017 02:25:50 No.3063456 Report

Quoted By:

>>3063450
I think you just don't know how to use a camera. There's a wealth of evidence of it being quite sharp from 2.8-11

Sounds like you're a moron with motion blur

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 25 Apr 2017 05:51:12 No.3063531 Report

Quoted By:

>>3062827
>>3062832
>>3062849
>>3063104
I guarantee this cunt doesn't remove the watermarks when printing out the photos either lmao, just imagine these hanging in someones hallway

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 26 Apr 2017 15:21:17 No.3064308 Report

Quoted By:

>>3063450
The original x100 didn't have an xtrans sensor among other things

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches