>>3069854Except the quality will always be in the film, that's what's great about it. Better scanning technology/affordability down the line means you can take any photos you shot on film and rescan at an even better resolution. How do you think they keep releasing better, remastered versions of 20+ year old movies? The old film stock is the same, but the capabilities to capture more detail in it keeps improving.
>>3069856If the day ever comes where they drop e6, then I'd agree it's completely over.
