>>3081970If you pick up any other DSLR not from the new sony A7 and up series, then you don't have fancy bonuses like In Body Stabilization, Back Sensor Illumination, Eye tracking, 300-700 points with 90%+ viewfinder coverage.
Yes they are all great technological advancements. But what these features among many others enable is for anyone to pick up a sony and take a picture which:
- Can shoot pictures in very low light without worry or knowledge of camera/lens type or attributes (ISO, F-Stop)
- Has in-body stabilization so less chance of blur for people not familiar with camera mechanics can have more pictures in focus without articulate technique
- Eye tracking so the camera focuses for you and people who don't have any concept of depth of field or tracking can still take portraits
- Over 90% viewfinder coverage so the camera will automatically focus on virtually anything in the frame so if you have almost no understanding of following a subject or how to focus on something, the camera will do it for you
Don't get me wrong, there are a lot of great things going on for the Sony technologically. It makes it a very promising camera in the hands of a seasoned photographer. But then people who are basically zero level on photography pick up something that is like steroids to their zero skill. They don't learn any fundamentals or mechanics around general photography and suddenly they are simply relying on performance of their work based on the camera's specs. That is the only thing they come to understand over time.
Like a super poor family winning the lottery or a really stupid person signing on to a massive sports contract. Even though they could buy all the same stuff as really rich people who built up to that point, they never built the fundamentals of money management and go bankrupt and poor almost immediately. Same applies to these Sony cameras.