>>3104893>a7ii sensor is oldsame generation and same factory as the sensor used in the xt2
>less than 1 stop better noise performanceNo, read about fuji cheating iso, when you take that into account it's very nearly 2 stops.
>resolving detail doesn't matterOK buddy, people are buying the otus because they want that premium manual focus experience then?
>fuji can use any lens toowithout af or electronic aperture and without giving the correct fov without an image quality ass fucking turbo adapter.
>sony has mixed resultsShown to focus faster with canon lenses than the best canon bodies, can also use the old sigma eos lenses that new canon bodies can't.
>reduced featuresno eye-af, a feature already unique to sony, that's it.
>urrrm nissin makes flashesgratz, you have one third party supplier, a 3rd party supplier that's known for being worse than metz/yongnuo/godox/everyone else, making 2 products for fuji, still no off camera flash option, oh and nissin had to disable HSS on their fuji mount flashes because fuji don't offer support for HSS.
>fuji has all the lenses sony hasLMAO, no, with fuji you're stuck with a single ethos; small, fast, soft until f7.1, unusable wide open. With Sony you have a lens for every occasion, and they're all tack sharp from wide open, wtf is the point in a lens with settings that make shots unusably bad.
>manual focus expensive lenseswhat is cine?
>NR is only noticeable in jpegsNo, it's heavy handedly slapped about in raws on anything iso 800 and above.
>sony has problems with aliasing and moirethen use a sony body with an aa filter, it's good to have the choice. And do you not think the very rare occasion moire becomes an issue is a fair trade off against x-trans with it's false color and color bleeding in every image?
