>>3105486Ask yourself questions
>Evf or ovfDo u want a viewfinder that shows exactly how your image will come out, focuses accurately under f2.8, has focus peaking and focus magnification and is typically much larger than dslr viewfinders.
Or do you want the 'real' tog experience of a little glass window, it may save 23/1000 of a second in lag.
>full frame or cropFull frame has an over 1 stop advantage in high iso noise and will offer much sharper images as it's less than half as demanding on your lenses. (Bigger surface catches more light, bigger image masks defects/softness in your lens better). Crop tends to have faster burst rate and less bokeh, useful for sport and sometimes macro/product photography.
>fuji vs sonyFuji has no third party companies making native lenses, no real flash system (no hss, no wirelss, unless you want to pay $500 for fujis flash unit that is out done by a $80 3rd party unit) and no new products lined up in it's official roadmap, some are saying fuji are gonna stop production on x mount products, which when you consider fuji now make lenses in sony mount, it may well be true. Fuji also gives very soft images in adobe products, you need to use silkypix or iridient developer to get sharp images, both of those bits of software are clunky as all hell.
Sony has more 3rd party support than any other mount, has been adopted by the cine industry, they have released the mount as an open format so anyone can make fully compatible lenses for free, they also have a wider product range, advanced technology with ibis and the sensors they keep back for themselves and have overtaken nikon to be the 2nd most sold ilc cameras.
Personally I'd say get the a7ii, it's everything one would need in a camera, unless you NEED 4k meme, in which case get the a7ii now and wait to afford an a7sii.
