>>3106483It's just better to know what youre working with.
Also, your images are noisy and unsharp, either the result of copious ammounts of bad compression or using a tiny and ancient smartphone sensor.
But since we care more about colours and composition:
>>3106470Alright, try to keep the human a bit lower, the image spends way too much realestate on sky and trees, more floor and the whole person please.
>>3106477uneventful landscape from a boring angle
>>3106479nice, but focus should be on the eye, try manual in close-focus cases
>>3106481Nothing of any form of interest
>>31064835th in 1st row and 2nd in 2nd row are overexposed, many others underexposed. 4th and 5th in 3rd row are nicely exposed, generally many are not level but that's fixable in post if you dont mind throwing pixels away. Composition is generally okay. you are sticking too closely to the middle of the frame try more thirds. It doesnt make your images magically better but it ensures you think about composing for a second and that you pay attention to what part of the subject is in the frame.
