>>3106717I'm not sure what's going on with all these different trips, but most of these are pretty snap-shitty.
Because you offer no context, I can only comment on what I see - and what I see is just a whole lot of snaps of mundane, uninteresting... stuff.
I see no use of composition (other than the most basic of subject in the middle), no understanding of shapes, lines, contrast or colors.
Of them all,
>>3106725 is the most interesting, as it shows a bit of foreground, middleground and background, as well as some use of diagonals - but overall, it's lacking a proper subject or something of interest.
Maybe if you offer some of your own thoughts and ideas, I can understand these better.
