>>3109313>It still exists in other forms of photography if you apply it.Sure, the technical challenge is everywhere. It's still more technically challenging to do macro than it is to, say, walk down an alley and take a photo of a dumpster with your kit lens.
>Actually everything you just said about "uniqueness" applies to photography in general, I'm not sure why on earth you think it's unique to macro photography somehow.I don't? I literally said it universal. In reference to your next point, I also never said that photos are "only good if they're new". I just said that the potential of macro photography hasn't been fully explored due to the technical challenge, which serves as both distraction and obstacle for the photographer.
>Tell us more about your insecurities, please.I'm a little paunchy and I can't seem to lose it, my teeth are fucked up, I think my hair is slightly thinning. Also my photos aren't as thematically cohesive as I'd like them to be, because I'm out of ideas and visually exhausted by my surroundings.
