Before I give any critique, it must be observed that all of this says as much about my own predilections as it does your work. I am in no way qualified to make objective or representative critique. Nonetheless, here goes.
>>3113240Under exposed. I can't see the girl, I can barely see the tunnel.
>>3113242I like this one for the diagonal in the background, but I think it's a touch dark. The cyclist's head intersects the diagonal line.
>>3113244This is nice. The colour, reflections in the train, and bluring of the train, along with the high contrast between light and shadow work really well. The perspective and leading lines also work well.
>>3113247I like the colour, but to me it's not really a photo of anything. I see no story, nothing interesting is grabbing my attention.
>>3113248This is a good photo. If I were you, I'd crop either most of the sky, or most of the wheat out, and I'd crop out the power lines.
>>3113249Photo of nothing again. Vaguely interesting light effect, it would probably be helped by a brighter exposure.
>>3113261Good photo, but no strong subject. Would be better with someone using the road.
>>3113267Good colour, interesting composition, I like the figure, but it could be cropped tighter on the top right. That's just a nothing little triangle.
>>3113268Lovely little photo.
>>3113269Foreground is distracting and adds nothing.
>>3113272I like this one, I see no major flaws.
>>3113703I love this one. All of the elements are justified, and it tells a lovely little story with the two children.
>>3113705Another photo of nothing.
>3113733There might be too much foreground.
