>>3119147Right, as promised.
Gonna be as honest as I can. If it makes you guys feel better, I'd hit my own work way harder than anyone I'm criticizing here, and I know most of you have capital qualities that I lack.
>>3118156New to photography? Seems like. Lots of snapshots.
If so, I can't really say more than "keep shooting".
Well, actually, I can. Avoid using your tele lens while you're learning photography.
>>3118467Are you using filters? Avoid it.
You were getting better; your february shots were your peak. But your late work seems disperse. Don't lose your heart, though -- but shoot more (I'm inferring by your upload dates that you aren't going out with your camera very often).
>>3118564I was already a follower. There's good stuff in your gallery, but keep in mind: your "Fontaine d'eau de Lolita" shot isn't nowhere in the same level as your "Black Canyon" shot. Do you really want to publish everything you photograph? It's an honest question.
>>3118705Your late work isn't bad; it's just... I've already seen it a thousand times in a thousand different photographers.
You already know how to take photos; the time to make your photography is upon you.
>>3118819Well, good stuff. Clean compositions etc. (The "lizard" photo is a bit off, though).
But my comment must not cheer you. Good isn't enough.
>>3118902It's bad, sorry. Your last upload (from today) illustrates well.
Minimalism has been an excuse to take pictures of nothing. If you have been shooting for 6 months, it's valid to do this kind of stuff as an exercise; but no more than that. Honestly, I wouldn't even publish it.
>>3118921New to photography? Again, if so, can't really say more than "keep shooting".
For now, just snapshots.
>>3118951Not sure how to tell this. You are a better photographer than a "digital artist".
Cont.
