>>3123212i literally just told you the google something and then you short-circuited and started ranting and raving calling me a pussy and a bitch, so who's really the smug dick here?
it would be totally reasonable if someone said "your comp is shit" and then you asked what was shitty about it. But he didn't. he criticized the barrel distortion, your white balance, and your underexposure. Nothing in there is needing further explanation, it's literally just definitions (e.g. what is barrel distortion). You're not asking to "see that photo through anon's eyes", you're just asking for him to provide definitions that you could easily do yourself (as someone just did right here
>>3123215). Those are all just definitions and explanations, nothing deeper.
Stop backtracking and deflecting about smugness when you're clearly being an arrogant asshole. You asked for super easy definitions that you could've googled and someone called you out for it and you got disproportionately triggered. So now you're backtracking and trying to deflect about it with a whole bunch of shit about high horses when all I did was tell you to google super easy googlable things.
>inb4 smug comment about how you can't be bothered to reply 
