>>3124968> Good gear won't make you a good photographerIt still contributes to the quality of your photos.
It's not really due to your very own skill but the one of skilled camera engineers, right. So what? Better tools for the job are usually the reason why we did anything better.
>>3124973> But at that point what are you improving on?Your photo's quality, unless you happen to do one of the few types of photography that really doesn't need any kind of accurate representation of the world. Which isn't most kinds by a huge margin.
> Some of the greatest photographs of all time are blurry, dark and grainyIf the Hindenburg travelled through time to perform its crash in a fiery inferno again, you'd likely be shit out of luck with your blurry, dark, grainy B&W photo if an array of good modern high resolution colour cameras was also present and each of them snapped 30+ perfectly sharp shots in the time it took you to do one.
