/p/ - Photography » Thread #3139534

[56 / 22 / ?]

742KiB, 2000x1336, P1290929.jpg

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:17:44 No.3139534 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3139804 >>3140361

My personal M4/3 thread, to disproof every hater of the system

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1160746.jpg, 503KiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:18:15 No.3139536 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1160714.jpg, 739KiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:19:16 No.3139537 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1160636.jpg, 195KiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:20:25 No.3139539 Report

Quoted By: >>3139816

Handheld

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1130712~01.jpg, 3MiB, 4000x2667

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:21:33 No.3139540 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:22:03 No.3139541 Report

Quoted By:

in b4 the autistic spammer shits on m43

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1130613~01.jpg, 4MiB, 4000x2667

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:22:57 No.3139542 Report

Quoted By: >>3139571 >>3139824

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1290861.jpg, 718KiB, 1336x2000

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:24:59 No.3139545 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1280796.jpg, 362KiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:26:07 No.3139547 Report

Quoted By: >>3139806

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1280583.jpg, 1MiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:27:29 No.3139548 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1280580.jpg, 1MiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:28:53 No.3139549 Report

Quoted By: >>3139588

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1150619.jpg, 409KiB, 2000x1336

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:30:48 No.3139550 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P1010613.jpg, 711KiB, 1200x901

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:35:09 No.3139553 Report

Quoted By: >>3139571 >>3139781

your photos are kinda meh bro

and i actually use m43 as my travel system

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P8050023edit - Copy.jpg, 3MiB, 2000x1496

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:38:30 No.3139558 Report

Quoted By: >>3139894

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 19:54:45 No.3139571 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139542
>>3139553
Only decent ones here rest are snapshits

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 20:29:57 No.3139588 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139549
lolwhat the actual fuck is this

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 26 Aug 2017 20:35:39 No.3139590 Report

Quoted By:

Looks like film cameras

Muhmegapickels !!0Z+XAssRGPW

Muhmegapickels !!0Z+XAssRGPW Sun 27 Aug 2017 04:12:19 No.3139780 Report

Quoted By: >>3139914

You know all of these could have been taken with a phone, right?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO P8250107.jpg, 1MiB, 750x1000

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 04:18:20 No.3139781 Report

Quoted By:

agree with >>3139553
these photos aren't really doing the system justice

I just take photos casually and an m43 seemed like a good option

I've really liked it so far

haven't had a chance to edit this latest batch yet

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 04:22:49 No.3139782 Report

Quoted By: >>3139868

how does micro four thirds make sense in this era of Fuji?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 05:02:19 No.3139785 Report

Quoted By:

i wanted to buy this camera but then i found out that the pancake lenses have electronic focus ring. fuck that.

now i get it why everyone moves to film photography

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 08:08:23 No.3139804 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139534
i like it!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 08:09:26 No.3139806 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139547
whatababe

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 08:40:10 No.3139812 Report

Quoted By: >>3139914

Why do these look worse quality than your average cell phone?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 08:46:00 No.3139816 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139539
>doing long time exposure in aperture priority, handeld
the absolute madman

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 09:07:25 No.3139824 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139542
nice!
i worked there

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 13:04:10 No.3139868 Report

Quoted By: >>3139886

>>3139782

4/3 is a fuckton more advanced and smaller, and arguably has better ergo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 13:40:26 No.3139886 Report

Quoted By: >>3139915

>>3139868
>more advanced
please explain

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 13:54:22 No.3139894 Report

Quoted By: >>3139900

>>3139558
wait, you took a bokehlicious photo with micro 4/3?
IMPOSSIBLE!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 14:09:09 No.3139900 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139894
That's not sharp, and not even bokehlicious

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 15:10:36 No.3139914 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139780
>>3139812
>n-no, m43 must suck. it has to, it just has toooooo!
delusional

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 15:12:27 No.3139915 Report

Quoted By: >>3139917 >>3139936 >>3140362

>>3139886

4/3 has much better autofocus, much better video, 5 axis ibis (and Panasonic can do dual image stabilization with certain lenses), pixel shift, etc etc

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 15:17:01 No.3139917 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139915
idk, those stuffs don't really matter that much to me. i think i'm just gonna save up more for a Fuji.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 16:04:30 No.3139936 Report

Quoted By: >>3139941

>>3139915
Autofocus on the X-T2 is pretty good with the newer lenses though. And iq is somewhat better.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 16:19:36 No.3139941 Report

Quoted By: >>3140067

>>3139936

One camera with a few lenses versus an entire ecosystem that is uniformly excellent.

Yes, image quality is pretty good, but is it worth the massive premium?

Full disclosure: I am an avid fujifilm shooter and love a lot of things about the ecosystem, but I also know not to pretend that it doesn't have some glaring deficiencies compared to other brands or formats.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO LRM_EXPORT_20170711_114652.jpg, 2MiB, 1536x2048

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 20:37:53 No.3140044 Report

Quoted By:

Recent travel w an olympus em5 mark ii

>couldn't be happier

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO LRM_EXPORT_20170711_105508.jpg, 2MiB, 1536x2048

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 20:40:44 No.3140047 Report

Quoted By:

No need for a bean bag inside the car

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 20:44:41 No.3140048 Report

Quoted By: >>3140055 >>3140354

majority of images in this thread have pretty crappy iq, i understand the value of the system for video but for stills oly and panasonic leave me cold

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO LRM_EXPORT_20170711_103909.jpg, 1MiB, 2048x1536

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 20:48:36 No.3140052 Report

Quoted By:

Taken w the oly 40-150mm pro zoom constant 2.8f

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO LRM_EXPORT_20170711_133950.jpg, 2MiB, 2048x1536

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 20:54:40 No.3140055 Report

Quoted By:

>>3140048
Im not a photographer tho but I use the system for traveling, hiking and flowers. Gardening is my passion and I always wanted to capture this kind of stuff. Sure ive spend a lot of money on lenses but at the time it made sense to me. I squeeze all I can from the gear... What do you mean by low iq in the pictures you see?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO LRM_EXPORT_20170827_150744.jpg, 2MiB, 1536x2048

Anonymous Sun 27 Aug 2017 21:10:26 No.3140067 Report

Quoted By: >>3140351

>>3139941
I met a pro photographer in my travels thru the amazon, she had all the latest gear, fuckton of lenses and a fuji xt2 body. Her camera couldn't keep up w the environment and her bag was immense. My half broken em5 mark ii worked flawlessly and all of my 8 lenses fit comfortably in a jansport. I was Miring her gear all the way tho fuji looks neato

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG-20170823-WA0003.jpg, 134KiB, 1280x799

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:00:28 No.3140342 Report

Quoted By:

Road street

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO IMG-20170713-WA0001.jpg, 204KiB, 1280x790

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:02:37 No.3140343 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:12:31 No.3140347 Report

Quoted By:

OP no one actually thinks m43 is that bad. However, your shitty Photographs only perpetuate the meme that it is only used by shitty retards.

Their point still stands

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:26:05 No.3140351 Report

Quoted By:

>>3140067
i believe you met chelsea northrup

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:28:47 No.3140354 Report

Quoted By:

>>3140048
you're just a gearfag

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Konica40mm.jpg, 222KiB, 2048x1365

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:35:01 No.3140357 Report

Quoted By: >>3140363

Problem I have with M43 is adaptable lenses.

Shit's steered me all the way to film and I've had to actually give up drinking for this shit.

Fuck M43. I hate you.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:39:08 No.3140361 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139534
>m43
>shoots in 3:2
lololololololololol

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:41:05 No.3140362 Report

Quoted By:

>>3139915
>sensor is gimped by sony
>still no bsi
>no stacked dram
>no iso or dr improvement
cucked.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 06:42:07 No.3140363 Report

Quoted By:

>>3140357
buy lens turbo 2.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 14:32:23 No.3140519 Report

Quoted By: >>3140522 >>3140552

I searched "om-d e-m10" and was surprised by how sharp the results are. I'm sold. Black em10, silver 17mm lens.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 14:35:13 No.3140522 Report

Quoted By:

>>3140519
Forgot to say, i searched on Flickr

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 15:35:34 No.3140552 Report

Quoted By: >>3140553

>>3140519
>17mm 2.8
>the worse lens olympus made after the kit zooms.
retard.
go with 20 1.7

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 15:39:49 No.3140553 Report

Quoted By: >>3140652

>>3140552
i don't care, it's my preferred focal length (equiv. 35mm) and it's small. idk about 20mm, it's too zoomed in. i don't want bokeh, it's a meme now.

Anonymous

Anonymous Mon 28 Aug 2017 20:10:22 No.3140652 Report

Quoted By: >>3140866

>>3140553
at least buy the 17/1.8, it's only marginally bigger.
17/2.8 is just frustrating

Anonymous

Anonymous Tue 29 Aug 2017 01:52:23 No.3140866 Report

Quoted By:

>>3140652
I don't even know the right focal length for me. Okay so if i choose 20mm (which is 40mm equiv.), at what range (in meters) should i stand from a 5'7 object if i want to get the whole body in the frame? All i know is that i might shoot close ups of lines and even 35mm (full frame equiv) will still make the lines look curved. It's a complicated thing to explain.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches