>>3144455This wouldn't be too bad if you would have framed it better. Wider lens, lower angle = less water, more buildings. Also this is soft due to diffraction. Don't shoot at f22. I wouldn't go past f14.
>>3144461I guess the color is kind of nice, but there's camera shake and it's not focused on anything. Also feels a little cramped, should've panned a bit to the right imo.
>>3144458How old are you? Have you actually tried learning? Do you own a computer? 8 months is quite a lot of time to get even some idea of a work flow... Get a computer, and a software that can open raw files, like rawtherapee 5. Watch some youtube videos how to edit, google how to use your software. And you know, read the manual that came with your camera.
Here's a recent snap I took while hiking, just a local river on cloudy day... I dusted off my old Nikon D80 with the 18-55 kit lens just to freshen my memories. It was actually quite fun to use for a change, less automation means more thought goes in to shooting and the hi iso noise and low dynamic range are limiting factors that you have to work around. Also while the ovf is small, it's still much more natural to use than evf I think, even a great one like the one on my x-t1. Image quality doesn't compare too well against todays cameras, there's not much room to fuck around in post processing.
