>>3162145This shot comes across lazy and messy, you haven't thought about composition and the edit is flat and uninspiring. Is the "going for a pee" pose supposed to be sexy? It's not.
>>3159254This is great, love the background, colors and shapes work great.
>>3162371>>3162373>>3162375Lighting, colors and model look great, graffiti background is pretty clichéd. I really like the 3rd shot.
>>3162562This doesn't work, composition is too central, too straight on and too tight. Also the model practically has his eyes closed.
>>3162625>>3162627>>3162629Your processing has gone a bit crunchy, try opening up the blacks and bringing down the shadows for smoother transitions. 1st pose works, the other 2 not so much. And if you have trouble with mf, change your body for something mirrorless, I'd recommend sony over fuji, the evf makes exposure and focus much easier.
>>3162675No, it's just you being too lazy and beta to do a real portrait photo.
>>3162902No, this is awful.
>>3163058It's a photo. It's in focus.
Lighting, pose, editing are all really, really dull though. Looks like an employee portrait photo at a low end funeral parlour.
>>3163065Colors and skin look great, kinda a shame about the goofy pose.
