>>3150483Honestly it's not even necessary for MF for something like this. I can gauran-fucking-tee that, up close, this isn'y sharp. That's fine. That's not a knock at resolution. It's just that the key to a photo like this is the viewing distance. People aren't going to be standing up against that wall looking for fine detail. If you're standing 10-15 feet back, it'll look plenty sharp enough.
You only really need MF or LF if you're printing something like a Gursky or Struth print, where it's fucking giant *and* meant to be viewed up close.
