>>3160505>Sugar memeLolz. It's actually a breddy gud lens, sharp a 2.8, the II is a I with better coatings. At 16mm it covers 135 format. You did good for 300 get the hood for it, thats about what I paid for mine.
>>3160507Because unlike 90% of gear shills here I actually own or have owned and shot on the stuff I shill and not everything I own I shill (Nikon 28 2.8 AF, 20 2.8 AI-s and post-1970 Soviet m39 a shit, Canon APS-c a collosal shit) when I came to /p/ I wished I had listened to the gear shills on here I would have bought a different system with primes. The Df and AF-D prime system I shoot now I purchased because of /p/ and the people who shilled them, including the Tokina 11-16, I'm not the first person to shill that lens.
My faggotry may know no bounds but I do know equipment, even if I suck with it
