>>3161214>i.e. you like a VSCO filtered shot of a nude model because it's a nude model that happens to have a "cool filter", not just because it has a filter.youre literally, utterly and frankly epically wrong.
a "filter", aka a recognizable aesthetic can make or break an art manifestation. there are pretty good songs nowadays that will never catch wind, because they dont sound "fresh" enough to be on radio, be it because lack of production values or whatever. the final coating is as important as the content itself.
when you consume that nude shot with a filter over it, youre consuming a lifestyle, as such filter separates that photo from straight mundane porn, it makes you feel youre better than your boomer dad who liked the same tits in his porn mags, but your experience is more stylish and refined.
