/p/ - Photography » Thread #3164043

[36 / 4 / ?]

54KiB, 600x400, iso-sensitivity-comparison.jpg

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 14:53:48 No.3164043 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>3164045 >>3164046 >>3164048 >>3164220 >>3165267 >>3165486 >>3165662 >>3165892 >>3166171 >>3166199 >>3166200

What is your personal ISO limit?
I shoot on a Nikon D3400, and I don't like going above 100 whenever possible.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 14:56:59 No.3164045 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
so you just shoot at minimum iso then?

thats pretty stupid my man. Up to 1600iso is fine after processing on most cameras.

If you need ISO, its better to brighten an image in camera and remove noise later in post than try to just boost shadows in post.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 14:57:33 No.3164046 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
of course as low as possible, but I'm fine going to about 4000 on the 6D, beyond that things are getting rough

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 15:00:18 No.3164047 Report

Quoted By: >>3165486

Professional work? South of 1600

My own artistic endeavors?
HI-BW2 BABY CRANK THAT FUCKER AND GET IT

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 15:02:02 No.3164048 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
Whatever I need to get the shot. If it needs to go at ISO 6400 then be it.
Pentax shooter btw, would be the same on Nikon and Sony. Canon shooters get cucked no matter what.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 15:08:47 No.3164052 Report

Quoted By: >>3164066 >>3165486

On most modern cameras there's practically no difference going from ISO100 to 400. If you have anything from the last two years you can safely go up to 6400.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 15:17:27 No.3164059 Report

Quoted By:

1600, but thats the max I would push color film.

Usually just 800 with cinestill 800T

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 15:21:23 No.3164062 Report

Quoted By:

delta 3200 on 6x7 is fantastic

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 15:34:18 No.3164066 Report

Quoted By:

Canon 7d, I tried to stick to 800 and below. Anything past 400 is visibly noisy, anyways - bplotchiness more than straight up regular noise, which is worse.
Canon 5d2, I go to 3200 if needed, but I tend to stick to max 1600. Doesn't get all blotchy like the canon crops, but it does get banding if I mess it up, that's the biggest quality killer.

>>3164052
This.
6400 can be iffy in general, but honestly any modern full frame camera will eat 3200 for breakfast and 6400 if you don't need really fine detail.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 17:34:23 No.3164143 Report

Quoted By: >>3164173

25,600.

Anything up to 6400, I barely see any noise even at 100%. At 12,800 and 25,600, I see it but it’s not really that bad most of the time.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 18:29:28 No.3164173 Report

Quoted By: >>3164258

>>3164143
Noise isn't the biggest problem with modern cameras.

Far worse are the colors at higher ISO's.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 19:22:02 No.3164207 Report

Quoted By:

When I had a D3400, I didn't dare go above 1600. It looked like garbage. Now I have a D750 and can deal with whatever.

ቖ

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO FOTO9332.jpg, 1MiB, 1600x1100

ቖ Wed 04 Oct 2017 19:43:21 No.3164216 Report

Quoted By: >>3164221

All of it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 20:03:51 No.3164220 Report

Quoted By: >>3164260

>>3164043
that's pretty shitty looking for 3200, do you know what camera they used for this?

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 20:06:09 No.3164221 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164216
Love it

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 21:05:18 No.3164258 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164173
>Far worse are the colors at higher ISO's.
Yeah, I'm not thrilled with the color at 12,800 and 25,600. But I still consider them usable.

Color at 6400 is perfectly fine on my camera.

Anonymous

Anonymous Wed 04 Oct 2017 21:08:21 No.3164260 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164220
>that's pretty shitty looking for 3200, do you know what camera they used for this?
It's from a "Learn about exposure" page, not a "Here's a review of camera X" page, so my guess is that it's not actually ISO 3200 from any camera but rather they took half of the ISO 100 image and added noise to it algorithmically to illustrate the point.

www.choiss.com

www.choiss.com Fri 06 Oct 2017 13:22:38 No.3165267 Report

Quoted By: >>3165311

>>3164043
shooting above iso 100 will always give you shit images. due to noise. Having noise in a photo is never acceptable. Either open the aperture or increase the shutter time or pick a brighter day. Noise makes anything look like shit

If you felt an emotional response to this comment please navigate to my website http://www.chosis.com to share how you feel.
All feedback is very valuable to me given that I have stage 3 bone cancer. I am really trying to live life in the photography "fast lane". Just because I have cancer doesn't mean you have to be nice in your comments, I want the complete human experience. Happy photo taking.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Oct 2017 14:36:45 No.3165311 Report

Quoted By: >>3166170

>>3165267
I think it's super fucked up that you keep posting that guy's website to trick people here into sending mean messages to a guy with bone cancer.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Oct 2017 19:05:53 No.3165463 Report

Quoted By:

I shoot film and i don't find digital noise that horrible looking.

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Donald Trump As Pepe The Frog At (...).jpg, 2MiB, 4928x3264

Anonymous Fri 06 Oct 2017 19:24:58 No.3165481 Report

Quoted By: >>3165558

My ISO limit is 1600 because I can afford to gain more aesthetically pleasing grain that adds more texture to the photograph as opposed to making it look muddled.

fucking cuck !!L1lx81epp6B

fucking cuck !!L1lx81epp6B Fri 06 Oct 2017 19:27:15 No.3165482 Report

Quoted By: >>3165486 >>3165545

6400 is my practical limit.

Sharp, but noisy is better than blurry, but clean.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Oct 2017 19:35:21 No.3165486 Report

Quoted By:

>>3165482
That's a good strategy.

>>3164052
Correct. That's what you're paying all that money for.

>>3164047
Me too

>>3164043
If you don't like the noise but like the shot, wash over it with your own grain.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Oct 2017 21:42:15 No.3165545 Report

Quoted By: >>3165560

>>3165482
you dont take pictures, so cuck off.

Anonymous

Anonymous Fri 06 Oct 2017 22:04:13 No.3165558 Report

Quoted By: >>3166225

>>3165481
>taking pictures of meme """artwork"""

fucking cuck !!L1lx81epp6B

fucking cuck !!L1lx81epp6B Fri 06 Oct 2017 22:06:04 No.3165560 Report

Quoted By:

>>3165545

yes i do

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 00:35:10 No.3165662 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
800

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 01:59:07 No.3165696 Report

Quoted By:

D3s here, I let autoISO go up to 12.8k. Usually usable if I get a good exposure, and it's got nice filmy grain. Only time it really looks like ass is noisy skies when I go for midnight handheld walkabouts.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 08:00:05 No.3165892 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
a7sII
i have no limit

chosis !!yxY9uMb7Or8

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Untitled-3.jpg, 848KiB, 3231x2652

chosis !!yxY9uMb7Or8 Sat 07 Oct 2017 20:16:51 No.3166170 Report

Quoted By: >>3166176

>>3165311
it's me!

If you felt an emotional response to this comment please navigate to my website http://www.chosis.com or www.instagram.com/chosis7 to share how you feel.
All feedback is very valuable to me given that I have stage 3 bone cancer. I am really trying to live life in the photography "fast lane". Just because I have cancer doesn't mean you have to be nice in your comments, I want the complete human experience. Happy photo taking.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 20:18:35 No.3166171 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
6400 is my max. noise reduction exists. you can average out like 10 (6400) pictures and reduce the amount of noise by adding more signal. for images you can't stack 6400 still aint bad. 99% of the time its gonna get downscaled and put on instagram so nobody can tell

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 20:22:56 No.3166176 Report

Quoted By:

>>3166170
b a s e d

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 21:16:59 No.3166199 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
Doesn't D3400 have a base ISO of 200?

If so, you're just throwing out a stop of highlight range.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 21:18:14 No.3166200 Report

Quoted By:

>>3164043
Canon 600D i dont like going above 1250

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 07 Oct 2017 22:11:49 No.3166225 Report

Quoted By:

>>3165558
the real life version of quoting a shitpost and responding with a shitpost

Anonymous

Anonymous Sun 08 Oct 2017 00:52:43 No.3166303 Report

Quoted By:

Realistically 800

If forced, 1600

I carry around a 50mm 1.2 or 1.4 at all times so ISO isn't typically a big issue until it gets really dark. In which case I usually crank it to 800 and shoot around 1/60. I could go way higher bc Sony noise is super low but I'd prefer to have a nice buffer for post process.

That being said my a6000 can still band and splotch like a bitch...

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches