>>3166731Not true.
OP here and I have been a stalwart defender of digital for years. The freedom to take 10,000 pics in a year (like I did when I got my first real digital camera) and have instant feedback to make instant changes to your technique is very valuable.
I've always liked film, and eventually learned to develop b&w, but only really thought of it as hipter lo-fi faggotry. Then a few movie directors, still using film even though they were digitising it later, and the facebook page I got the OP image from, chipped away at me.
You make a thousand judgements when you see an image, and while you might not be able to articulate everything, it all builds an emotional response. A frame from Blade Runner might look similar to a frame of an episode of Dr Who, but even people that are unfamiliar with both would be able to tell that one is the real deal and the other is kids TV.
This is the difference between shooting film and digital.
