>>3175217>how did she get away with it?1. Her work is not child pornography, strictly speaking, because the photos are not sexual and not shot with jerkin’ it as their main artistic goal. Just being nude doesn’t make it porn. It’s not intended to tittilate.
2. She also faced a bunch of legal troubles and backlash for it anyway, because you’re not the only person who doesn’t understand point #1. So I don’t know if “got away with it” is really the right phrase.
3. They’re her own kids, and she’s a heterosexual woman, and both of those things support point #1 that it’s not child porn.
4. The fact that she profited off of the photos is immaterial, since they’re her kids, which means the money she made from the photos probably went right back into feeding, clothing, and housing the family.
5. The kids, who are long since grown up, did not and do not feel exploited.