>>3177722It's not the photo that's childish, it's the watermark that's childish, like it said, it has childish fonts, and it has childish colors. And it's pointless because nobody is going to steal that image.
>Any other examples of shit photography like this?I don't have any saved on my computer, but you can go into the recent photo threads and see tons of shitty photos. But it's mostly people that are learning.
I can't tell you how to avoid boring photos, except don't take them. I know that's not helpful though. A great way to learn how to take good photos though is to go to flicker, check out some of the popular pictures of the day and see some of the ones you like. Just look at them, and make notes of what you like in the images, and how to recreate whatever it is you like. Just copy other peoples photos for like 6 months to get a feel for what you do and don't like. And you'll eventually start forming your own photos.
It's not a big deal to watermark your images, we just mock it on here when people watermark absolutely horrid images, that's all.
>I notice users here are pretty reluctant to post their own work here.I rarely post my images on here, mostly because you can reverse image search them very easily and people can find me. I just don't like that on 4chan. But from time to time I will. I just never attach an opinion to my images because that will undoubtedly anger some autist on here and they'll fuck with me. I've had it happen before. With that being said, here's an image that to my knowledge can't be reversed image searched back to me yet.
